 |
Re: Processor? Or maybe storage.
Author: Freericks
Date: 12-26-2010 - 16:23
John West Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I always assumed the color shirt on my Ektachromes
> had something to do with the processor, since some
> of my rolls were processed by Kodak others by
> Drewry. But when I went back and looked more
> closely, sorting through the numbering and subject
> matter to reassemble shots by roll, it turned out
> that some frames from a roll had shifted and other
> frames from the same roll were as good as the day
> they were shot. So all I can suggest is maybe
> storage or useage...perhaps projecting an
> Ektachrome accelerated the shift...although even
> that does not readily corrolate with my stuff. I
> remains a curiousity for me. Here is an
> Ektachrome that looks as good as it did in 1960:
>
> 1960 Ektachrome
>
> JBWX
I think you're right, John... there is a certain amount of this degradation that seems random.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I always assumed the color shirt on my Ektachromes
> had something to do with the processor, since some
> of my rolls were processed by Kodak others by
> Drewry. But when I went back and looked more
> closely, sorting through the numbering and subject
> matter to reassemble shots by roll, it turned out
> that some frames from a roll had shifted and other
> frames from the same roll were as good as the day
> they were shot. So all I can suggest is maybe
> storage or useage...perhaps projecting an
> Ektachrome accelerated the shift...although even
> that does not readily corrolate with my stuff. I
> remains a curiousity for me. Here is an
> Ektachrome that looks as good as it did in 1960:
>
> 1960 Ektachrome
>
> JBWX
I think you're right, John... there is a certain amount of this degradation that seems random.
