Re: Last year for 2-8-2 #4960?
Author: T Judah
Date: 03-17-2011 - 10:24

Question?

Does anybody know what is the technical reason for the federal regulations, that limit a steam locomotive boiler to 15 years? My understanding is that the 15 year inspection is very invasive, requiring at least a partial tear down; and so is way too expensive.

Why 15 years? Is that just an arbitrary number, or is there some physical reality that says 15 years is as much as prudence will allow?


Just asking - because I don't know.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Grand Canyon Steam is back Mitch Goldman 03-07-2011 - 21:53
  Re: Grand Canyon Steam Tom Moungovan 03-08-2011 - 06:36
  Re: Grand Canyon Steam 2-6-2T 03-08-2011 - 07:32
  Re: Grand Canyon Steam Mitch Goldman 03-08-2011 - 08:01
  Re: Grand Canyon Steam Mike Swanson 03-08-2011 - 12:49
  Support the survivors John West 03-08-2011 - 14:53
  Grand Canyon Steam is back - well, sort of Richard 03-08-2011 - 15:06
  Re: Grand Canyon Steam is back - well, sort of Tom Moungovan 03-08-2011 - 15:50
  Diesel helper? John West 03-08-2011 - 16:07
  Re: Diesel helper? Tom Moungovan 03-08-2011 - 17:47
  Last year for 2-8-2 #4960? Mitch 03-11-2011 - 21:49
  Re: Last year for 2-8-2 #4960? GCR_18 03-15-2011 - 21:18
  Re: Last year for 2-8-2 #4960? T Judah 03-17-2011 - 10:24


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **    **  **     **   *******    ******   
 **     **   **  **   ***   ***  **     **  **    **  
 **     **    ****    **** ****  **         **        
 **     **     **     ** *** **  ********   **   **** 
 **     **     **     **     **  **     **  **    **  
 **     **     **     **     **  **     **  **    **  
 ********      **     **     **   *******    ******   
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com