Re: Crash at Portola?
Author: Ooooooops
Date: 08-05-2011 - 11:18

I know Portola makes most of their income from the RAL program.

IMHO due to liability issues, the RAL program should only be run when no other trains are operating (or they can be physically separated), and visitors wandering around the property are at a minimum. Especially a carbody unit (regardless of the back up camera). Was it operating in reverse?

Sounds like 1) the switchtender left their assigned duty post 2) the RAL supervising engineer did not have control of the movement

An injury and damaged historic equipment is not worth it. If there is such a demand for RALs, then raise the fare to maintain revenue levels instead of unreasonably increasing liability exposure for a few more bucks.

My opinion ....



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Crash at Portola? Claims Agent 08-05-2011 - 00:37
  Re: Crash at Portola? Rid 08-05-2011 - 10:12
  WP 917 Eugene 08-05-2011 - 10:26
  Re: WP 917 Rid 08-06-2011 - 11:02
  Re: Crash at Portola? Ooooops 08-05-2011 - 10:28
  Re: Crash at Portola? njt 08-05-2011 - 11:01
  Re: Crash at Portola? Ooooooops 08-05-2011 - 11:18
  Cause Eugene 08-05-2011 - 11:43
  Re: Crash at Portola? Restricted Speed 08-06-2011 - 02:45
  Re: Crash at Portola? SP5103 08-06-2011 - 07:48
  Re: Crash at Portola? Restricted Speed 08-24-2011 - 23:50
  Re: Crash at Portola? Oldie 08-05-2011 - 17:48
  Re: Crash at Portola? Fred 08-05-2011 - 19:37
  Re: Crash at Portola? Claims Agent 08-05-2011 - 22:08
  Re: Crash at Portola? Tom Carter - Director - FRRS 08-06-2011 - 22:24
  Re: Crash at Portola? OPRRMS 08-06-2011 - 23:17
  Re: Crash at Portola? Tippy 08-07-2011 - 10:29
  Re: Crash at Portola? Topper 08-07-2011 - 10:31
  Re: Crash at Portola? Major English 08-09-2011 - 03:33
  Re: Crash at Portola? Stickler 08-09-2011 - 09:21
  Re: Crash at Portola? Tom 08-05-2011 - 23:42
  Re: Crash at Portola? Shortline Sammie 08-06-2011 - 07:38
  Re: Crash at Portola? OPRRMS 08-06-2011 - 12:23
  Re: Crash at Portola? Ghosts of Incidents Past 08-06-2011 - 12:54
  Re: Crash at Portola? Reader 08-06-2011 - 13:04
  Re: Crash at Portola? teo 08-07-2011 - 09:53
  Re: Crash at Portola? FresnoSub 08-07-2011 - 12:29
  Re: Crash at Portola? Tom 08-07-2011 - 12:29
  Re: Crash at Portola? OPRRMS 08-07-2011 - 12:50
  Re: Crash at Portola? Dr Zarkoff 08-07-2011 - 23:24
  Re: Crash at Portola? SP5103 08-07-2011 - 15:45
  Re: Crash at Portola? Don't Ask Don't Tell 08-07-2011 - 16:25
  Re: Crash at Portola? Tipo 08-07-2011 - 17:42
  Re: Crash at Portola? eo 08-07-2011 - 17:45
  Re: Crash at Portola? M. Harris 08-07-2011 - 17:55
  Re: Crash at Portola? Shortline Sammie 08-07-2011 - 19:55
  Re: Crash at Portola? Observer 08-07-2011 - 21:05
  Re: Crash at Portola? FresnoSub 08-08-2011 - 08:45
  Re: Crash at Portola? Dr Zarkoff 08-08-2011 - 09:45
  Re: Crash at Portola? topper 08-08-2011 - 10:58
  Clearing up a few things Eugene 08-08-2011 - 11:35
  Re: Clearing up a few things Link 08-08-2011 - 12:11
  Re: Thanks Eugene Tom Moungovan 08-08-2011 - 12:47
  Re: Thanks Eugene George Andrews 08-08-2011 - 20:43
  Re: Thanks Eugene Mike Lepker 08-21-2011 - 20:30
  Re: Thanks Eugene OPRRMS 08-22-2011 - 14:07
  Re: Thanks Eugene Glen Icanberry 08-24-2011 - 22:56


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **   ******   **     **   ******    ******** 
 **     **  **    **  **     **  **    **   **       
 **     **  **        **     **  **         **       
 *********  **        **     **  **   ****  ******   
 **     **  **        **     **  **    **   **       
 **     **  **    **  **     **  **    **   **       
 **     **   ******    *******    ******    ******** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com