Re: Crash at Portola?
Author: SP5103
Date: 08-07-2011 - 15:45

>When you put your time and/or money into keeping these old trains running, THEN you are entitled to your opinions.

I have! I lived in the Reno area years ago, and would often be up at Portola mid-week getting roped into whatever project Hap, Norm, Jim, Hank et al had going on at the time. Having outside railroad experience, it wasn't unusual for me to be running an engine while the local rails worked the ground since they knew where they wanted to respot the equipment. Ever had the 707 hanging onto so many cars you were looking across the loop for hand signals? I didn't just run the 707 and the other engines, I spent a fair share of time fixing them. The only F unit I ever ran was the B at Portola to get it in and out of the shop while doing some work on it.

Weekends were another story. The whole attitude changed at Portola when you had the "weekend warriors" without any real railroad experience. I quit volunteering at Portola and other museums because I got treated like $hit by most of the play-boys. I am not "qualified" to run because I don't have "seniority", but I have been PAID to do almost every craft on the railroad. Take your pick - steam, diesel, tourist, shortline, Class 1, industrial as conductor, engineer, trackman, signal maintainer, mechanic or manager. I have probably already forgotten more about the railroad industry than most of the non-rail weekend warriors will ever know. But I was more than welcome to fix the toys they had broken, I just wasn't qualifed to run them!

So - What happened? Why did it happen? Has the appropriate action (including discipline as required) to prevent it from happening again? Has the entire RAL program been reviewed as a result, especially considering the huge potential for serious injury or worse? Since the alleged damage was on the nose, this suggests that visibility was not a big issue and the same incident may have occured with a Geep or switcher - both of which are just as hard to repair or replace as an F unit.

Don't cry poor. The RAL program has made many, many dollars over the years for FRRS. A portion of every dollar should have been set aside to pay for overhauls for the hours run, and repairs resulting from inexperienced people running the engines. The primary purpose of a historical museum is NOT to provide equipment for volunteers or those with a few bucks to play with.

And - many of those posting here have PROFESSIONAL railroad experience. And don't @#$%& too much about railfans, they are your potential future member/volunteers and RAL customers. These are not toy trains - these are the real thing and if lose respect for that fact that can maim or kill you, regardless if you are a guest, a volunteer or paid employee.

My 2 cents ...



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Crash at Portola? Claims Agent 08-05-2011 - 00:37
  Re: Crash at Portola? Rid 08-05-2011 - 10:12
  WP 917 Eugene 08-05-2011 - 10:26
  Re: WP 917 Rid 08-06-2011 - 11:02
  Re: Crash at Portola? Ooooops 08-05-2011 - 10:28
  Re: Crash at Portola? njt 08-05-2011 - 11:01
  Re: Crash at Portola? Ooooooops 08-05-2011 - 11:18
  Cause Eugene 08-05-2011 - 11:43
  Re: Crash at Portola? Restricted Speed 08-06-2011 - 02:45
  Re: Crash at Portola? SP5103 08-06-2011 - 07:48
  Re: Crash at Portola? Restricted Speed 08-24-2011 - 23:50
  Re: Crash at Portola? Oldie 08-05-2011 - 17:48
  Re: Crash at Portola? Fred 08-05-2011 - 19:37
  Re: Crash at Portola? Claims Agent 08-05-2011 - 22:08
  Re: Crash at Portola? Tom Carter - Director - FRRS 08-06-2011 - 22:24
  Re: Crash at Portola? OPRRMS 08-06-2011 - 23:17
  Re: Crash at Portola? Tippy 08-07-2011 - 10:29
  Re: Crash at Portola? Topper 08-07-2011 - 10:31
  Re: Crash at Portola? Major English 08-09-2011 - 03:33
  Re: Crash at Portola? Stickler 08-09-2011 - 09:21
  Re: Crash at Portola? Tom 08-05-2011 - 23:42
  Re: Crash at Portola? Shortline Sammie 08-06-2011 - 07:38
  Re: Crash at Portola? OPRRMS 08-06-2011 - 12:23
  Re: Crash at Portola? Ghosts of Incidents Past 08-06-2011 - 12:54
  Re: Crash at Portola? Reader 08-06-2011 - 13:04
  Re: Crash at Portola? teo 08-07-2011 - 09:53
  Re: Crash at Portola? FresnoSub 08-07-2011 - 12:29
  Re: Crash at Portola? Tom 08-07-2011 - 12:29
  Re: Crash at Portola? OPRRMS 08-07-2011 - 12:50
  Re: Crash at Portola? Dr Zarkoff 08-07-2011 - 23:24
  Re: Crash at Portola? SP5103 08-07-2011 - 15:45
  Re: Crash at Portola? Don't Ask Don't Tell 08-07-2011 - 16:25
  Re: Crash at Portola? Tipo 08-07-2011 - 17:42
  Re: Crash at Portola? eo 08-07-2011 - 17:45
  Re: Crash at Portola? M. Harris 08-07-2011 - 17:55
  Re: Crash at Portola? Shortline Sammie 08-07-2011 - 19:55
  Re: Crash at Portola? Observer 08-07-2011 - 21:05
  Re: Crash at Portola? FresnoSub 08-08-2011 - 08:45
  Re: Crash at Portola? Dr Zarkoff 08-08-2011 - 09:45
  Re: Crash at Portola? topper 08-08-2011 - 10:58
  Clearing up a few things Eugene 08-08-2011 - 11:35
  Re: Clearing up a few things Link 08-08-2011 - 12:11
  Re: Thanks Eugene Tom Moungovan 08-08-2011 - 12:47
  Re: Thanks Eugene George Andrews 08-08-2011 - 20:43
  Re: Thanks Eugene Mike Lepker 08-21-2011 - 20:30
  Re: Thanks Eugene OPRRMS 08-22-2011 - 14:07
  Re: Thanks Eugene Glen Icanberry 08-24-2011 - 22:56


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **         ********  ********  ********  **    ** 
 **    **      **     **        **         **  **  
 **    **      **     **        **          ****   
 **    **      **     ******    ******       **    
 *********     **     **        **           **    
       **      **     **        **           **    
       **      **     ********  ********     **    
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com