 |
Re: Les is more.... Is that a taxpayer supplied response from CAHSRA?
Author: les
Date: 07-30-2019 - 11:02
Prop 1a, unlike AB-32, was voter approved so not sure the legislature can do much about it.
There have been multiple attempts at voter override but all have failed.
I think a voter initiative to send some off a cliff would not be a bad idea in the slightest.
BOB2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Proposition 1A, as I noted, was written "by and
> for" the thieves that wrote it... So who cares
> what this initiative says, it is a boondoggle.
> The legislature should rewrite it, and move on to
> "salvaging" what we can from this fiasco, and
> doing what they can to stop the continued waste,
> incompetence, and arrogance displayed by the ill
> conceived, incompetently planned, voter "con job",
> that is the CAHSRA "runaway money train"...
>
> Or, is Proposition 1A now a holy writ, (sort of
> only like the ten commandments, without the that
> shall not steal, or thou shall not bear false
> witness part, which would be omitted this being
> the CAHSRA...). Is this self serving language
> written by and for these consultants into the
> initiative somehow now an "immutable" law, and
> mere man may never change it, ever again, for all
> of time...? No matter how costly and ridiculous
> it has become?
>
> So, according to Les and his "logic" lesson in the
> "rule of law", if a majority of voters were to
> pass an initiative to make everyone jump off a
> cliff, our only hope would be that those who voted
> for it, would (and thus, apparently thinking this
> is such a great idea...) jump first...? So, that
> by the time they get to me, and the rest of us
> with a lick of good sense left, we can repeal
> it....?
>
> God forbid, that we ever could come to our senses,
> and asking WTF were we thinking when we did
> something as stupid and wasteful as falling for
> horse crap like this CAHSRA fiasco, and change it?
There have been multiple attempts at voter override but all have failed.
I think a voter initiative to send some off a cliff would not be a bad idea in the slightest.
BOB2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Proposition 1A, as I noted, was written "by and
> for" the thieves that wrote it... So who cares
> what this initiative says, it is a boondoggle.
> The legislature should rewrite it, and move on to
> "salvaging" what we can from this fiasco, and
> doing what they can to stop the continued waste,
> incompetence, and arrogance displayed by the ill
> conceived, incompetently planned, voter "con job",
> that is the CAHSRA "runaway money train"...
>
> Or, is Proposition 1A now a holy writ, (sort of
> only like the ten commandments, without the that
> shall not steal, or thou shall not bear false
> witness part, which would be omitted this being
> the CAHSRA...). Is this self serving language
> written by and for these consultants into the
> initiative somehow now an "immutable" law, and
> mere man may never change it, ever again, for all
> of time...? No matter how costly and ridiculous
> it has become?
>
> So, according to Les and his "logic" lesson in the
> "rule of law", if a majority of voters were to
> pass an initiative to make everyone jump off a
> cliff, our only hope would be that those who voted
> for it, would (and thus, apparently thinking this
> is such a great idea...) jump first...? So, that
> by the time they get to me, and the rest of us
> with a lick of good sense left, we can repeal
> it....?
>
> God forbid, that we ever could come to our senses,
> and asking WTF were we thinking when we did
> something as stupid and wasteful as falling for
> horse crap like this CAHSRA fiasco, and change it?
