 |
Re: 2016 vs. 2020: the differences
Author: WAF
Date: 09-19-2020 - 11:53
Cresco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Great. Now Trump can nominate a third justice to
> the court, which is why the American People
> elected him. All the leftists will complain that
> in 2016 McConnell didn't let Obama nominate
> because it was an election year. That's true to an
> extent, but that only applied in a year ending in
> 6. This year ends in a 0. Next election cycle this
> rule would apply is 2036, although historians
> debate whether the true significance of the 2016
> rule was that it started with a 20 and ended with
> a 16, in which case the ending in a 6 criteria is
> mooted. So it wouldn't be until 20016 that rule
> would apply again.
>
> Once again, the liberals don't care about history,
> they want to make up their own facts, and tear
> this country apart, ruining it.
Only ONE person is tearing this country apart besides being a traitor to his country. His name name starts with a T
-------------------------------------------------------
> Great. Now Trump can nominate a third justice to
> the court, which is why the American People
> elected him. All the leftists will complain that
> in 2016 McConnell didn't let Obama nominate
> because it was an election year. That's true to an
> extent, but that only applied in a year ending in
> 6. This year ends in a 0. Next election cycle this
> rule would apply is 2036, although historians
> debate whether the true significance of the 2016
> rule was that it started with a 20 and ended with
> a 16, in which case the ending in a 6 criteria is
> mooted. So it wouldn't be until 20016 that rule
> would apply again.
>
> Once again, the liberals don't care about history,
> they want to make up their own facts, and tear
> this country apart, ruining it.
Only ONE person is tearing this country apart besides being a traitor to his country. His name name starts with a T
