 |
Re: totally OT but slow newsday laffs - decarceration
Author: YYY's Buddy
Date: 07-29-2021 - 00:57
YYY's Buddy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>This is the first "insurrection" I've ever heard of where the police who were supposed to be protecting the building opened the doors to let them in and then the "insurrectionists" posed for pictures with the media.
Yes, there were some police who let the peaceful protesters into the Capitol. However, other police were physically attacked, some severely.
>Why did they let them in? Why did Nancy Pelosi earlier decline offers for reinforcements?
So much for the idea that the radical right is more pro-police than those on the left.
>The January 6th incident is the ONLY time where The Left is pro-police. All other times they're asking for police to be defunded and they hate police.
We will probably never know the extent that AntiFa operatives, posing as Trump supporters, added gasoline to the fire.
No evidence of that.
>Yes there is. [www.newyorker.com] He says he's not AntiFa but his credibility is on a par with Jusse Smollett.
On the contrary, many of the January 6 peaceful protesters had bonda-fide 3%, Proud Boys and other assorted Trumpie credentials and posted selfies of themselves engaged in the insurrection.
>The "insurrection" where the capitol police let them in and Nancy Pelosi declined reinforcements? There. Fixed it for you.
>We will likewise probably never know the extent that undercover FBI agents were involved in, likewise, adding gasoline to the fire. It's all starting to come out now how much the FBI was involved in the kidnapping plot of Michigan governor Wittmer.
Oh really? Hmmm, wonder who would have directed that? Guess that would be another reason to put Trump in jail.
>With crooks like Peter Strzok and James Comey running the FBI, do you REALLY expect Trump to run a corruption-free institution like that? Get real. There's so much corruption in Washington that Trump barely had an opportunity to scratch the surface in trying to clean it up.
Anything to make the far-right look bad, up to and including fabricated crimes. Then we have the crooked Main Stream Media putting their two cents in with totally fabricated stories, like the one where they said Trump supporters clubbed a policeman to death with a fire extinguisher.
During the January 6 peaceful protest, 140 officers were still injured, some seriously.
>Yeah, one was even clubbed to death by Trump supporters with a fire extinguisher. Right? Right? Right? Just like how Nick Sandmann spouted ethnic slurs to that Indian dude with the criminal history. Right? Right?
Nice deflection. Now, would you care to address the total bullshit story by the New York Times? Do you need any more evidence that the MSM functions as a cheerleader for the Democrat party?
As far as the "crooked Main Stream Media," was the Main Stream Media crooked when it reported that many very conservative Republican representatives and Senators won their races in November?
>They were going after the big fish Trump. They couldn't steal EVERY election. The media may have reported SOME races with a certain degree of accuracy.
I tell you what, if all of these lawmakers announced that the reporting on their elections was fabricated by the media and they all resign, then I will believe what you say about the media.
>Here's three. But I'm sure that won't be sufficient for you. Shall we talk about how CNN's journalistic malpractice made Nick Sandmann a very rich teenager? [money.cnn.com]
There are a lot of posts with links to articles about the cost overruns, schedule delays and other problems with the California High-Speed rail project. Yet no one ever posts any comments implying that the Main Stream Media is misinforming the public about the project.
>When it come to fraudulent reporting and fabricating bullshit, the MSM likes to focus its energies on politics in Washington. Some of their reporters probably think HSR stands for "housing and suburban resources". It's not etched in stone that they have to misreport every story and every topic.
Sometimes things happen that do not support your view of the world and the main stream and specialty media report it. Grow up and deal with it.
>Maybe one day you'll take a Red Pill and see the world as it really is. Have you ever wondered why Fox News has such good ratings and CNN's ratings are so piss poor that certain independent Internet creators are bringing in better numbers than they are?
-------------------------------------------------------
>This is the first "insurrection" I've ever heard of where the police who were supposed to be protecting the building opened the doors to let them in and then the "insurrectionists" posed for pictures with the media.
Yes, there were some police who let the peaceful protesters into the Capitol. However, other police were physically attacked, some severely.
>Why did they let them in? Why did Nancy Pelosi earlier decline offers for reinforcements?
So much for the idea that the radical right is more pro-police than those on the left.
>The January 6th incident is the ONLY time where The Left is pro-police. All other times they're asking for police to be defunded and they hate police.
We will probably never know the extent that AntiFa operatives, posing as Trump supporters, added gasoline to the fire.
No evidence of that.
>Yes there is. [www.newyorker.com] He says he's not AntiFa but his credibility is on a par with Jusse Smollett.
On the contrary, many of the January 6 peaceful protesters had bonda-fide 3%, Proud Boys and other assorted Trumpie credentials and posted selfies of themselves engaged in the insurrection.
>The "insurrection" where the capitol police let them in and Nancy Pelosi declined reinforcements? There. Fixed it for you.
>We will likewise probably never know the extent that undercover FBI agents were involved in, likewise, adding gasoline to the fire. It's all starting to come out now how much the FBI was involved in the kidnapping plot of Michigan governor Wittmer.
Oh really? Hmmm, wonder who would have directed that? Guess that would be another reason to put Trump in jail.
>With crooks like Peter Strzok and James Comey running the FBI, do you REALLY expect Trump to run a corruption-free institution like that? Get real. There's so much corruption in Washington that Trump barely had an opportunity to scratch the surface in trying to clean it up.
Anything to make the far-right look bad, up to and including fabricated crimes. Then we have the crooked Main Stream Media putting their two cents in with totally fabricated stories, like the one where they said Trump supporters clubbed a policeman to death with a fire extinguisher.
During the January 6 peaceful protest, 140 officers were still injured, some seriously.
>Yeah, one was even clubbed to death by Trump supporters with a fire extinguisher. Right? Right? Right? Just like how Nick Sandmann spouted ethnic slurs to that Indian dude with the criminal history. Right? Right?
Nice deflection. Now, would you care to address the total bullshit story by the New York Times? Do you need any more evidence that the MSM functions as a cheerleader for the Democrat party?
As far as the "crooked Main Stream Media," was the Main Stream Media crooked when it reported that many very conservative Republican representatives and Senators won their races in November?
>They were going after the big fish Trump. They couldn't steal EVERY election. The media may have reported SOME races with a certain degree of accuracy.
I tell you what, if all of these lawmakers announced that the reporting on their elections was fabricated by the media and they all resign, then I will believe what you say about the media.
>Here's three. But I'm sure that won't be sufficient for you. Shall we talk about how CNN's journalistic malpractice made Nick Sandmann a very rich teenager? [money.cnn.com]
There are a lot of posts with links to articles about the cost overruns, schedule delays and other problems with the California High-Speed rail project. Yet no one ever posts any comments implying that the Main Stream Media is misinforming the public about the project.
>When it come to fraudulent reporting and fabricating bullshit, the MSM likes to focus its energies on politics in Washington. Some of their reporters probably think HSR stands for "housing and suburban resources". It's not etched in stone that they have to misreport every story and every topic.
Sometimes things happen that do not support your view of the world and the main stream and specialty media report it. Grow up and deal with it.
>Maybe one day you'll take a Red Pill and see the world as it really is. Have you ever wondered why Fox News has such good ratings and CNN's ratings are so piss poor that certain independent Internet creators are bringing in better numbers than they are?
