Two Engineers Speak Out About Those Dreaded Cab Cars
Author: Holly Gibson
Date: 02-21-2009 - 13:29

While not focusing so much on the phenomena of "lonesome cab," here's an interesting article from the LA TIMES from 1988 (when push-pull cab car operation was introduced on Amtrak's SAN DIEGANS). The two Amtrak engineers felt so strongly about the issue that they braved discipline from their employer for speaking negatively to the media.

* * * * * * * * * * *

Amtrak's L.A.-San Diego Line Rail Engineers Call Cars Unsafe
[Orange County Edition]
Los Angeles Times
SHARI R. MICHELS
July 3, 1988

For six months, on trips between Los Angeles and San Diego, engineer William Rogers had not been allowed to ride in his locomotive. Instead, he was forced to ride at the opposite end of the train. And Rogers missed his locomotive.

Under a new Amtrak policy instituted in October, Rogers had to make about half the trips while operating the train from a recently introduced cab control car that runs the engine almost by remote control.

The cab cars, brought from Amtrak's New York-Washington line, are useful because they allow trains to move in both directions-saving time that would otherwise be used to turn around or "wye" the train.

Trains Backed In

Most engineers on the Los Angeles-San Diego line now have to back their trains into San Diego's Santa Fe Depot from what Rogers described as a modified coach car - and they are none too happy about it. They say they dislike the cabs because they place them closer to the track, reduce their control of the engine and knowledge of where it is, and severely reduce visibility, especially at night. Rogers, 42, of San Bernardino has been an engineer for nine years, yet he said he feels he did not have "precise control" of the engine when operating the train from the cab cars rather than the locomotive. For example, he said he couldn't see a gauge that shows the power level of the engine, nor could he judge whether one of the train's two brake systems was working.

Rogers said he has left the cab-car position because of stress, and last week began a new position as a switch engineer in a yard in Los Angeles.

Amtrak officials deny that any problems exist with the cab control cars, eight of which are operating on the Los Angeles - San Diego line. They are safe and have no disadvantages, said Arthur Lloyd, director of public affairs for Amtrak's western region. Lloyd said the cars, which have been used in Chicago for 25 years and are also used in San Francisco, are as safe as they are economical.

More Suited to East Coast?

However, Rogers said the cars are more suited for use on the East Coast, where there are fewer grade crossings and track signals are transmitted by radio so engineers cannot easily miss them.

San Diegan Greg E. Luiz, 38, a locomotive engineer for 15 years, said the cab cars are "an accident waiting to happen." Luiz, who also works the Los Angeles-San Diego line, likened the change from 125-ton locomotives to the 55-ton cab cars to climbing out of a tank and into a telephone booth. He said the situation is even more frightening when a 430-ton train is traveling at 90 m.p.h. According to Luiz, most of the nearly 30 men on the line dislike the refitted cars for a long list of reasons - mainly their concern for their safety and the safety of the train. Luiz cited an accident involving a cab car in Chicago in which a train hit a garbage truck and overturned. "We hit a garbage truck with a locomotive and the nose gets dented," he said hypothetically.

Delay of More Than an Hour

He recalled an incident on the 128-mile route between Los Angeles and San Diego. The trip is scheduled to take about 2 hours and 45 minutes, but a malfunction in the locomotive caused a delay of an hour and 20 minutes. Luiz, who was operating from the cab at the time, had to slow to a 20-m.p.h. crawl for 9 miles because of a problem with the whistle, which an engineer is required by law to blow at every grade crossing. Luiz said that if he had been in the engine rather than the cab, he could have patched up the whistle.

Engineers have also charged that the locks on the cab cars' heavy doors are inadequate and swing open easily. Luiz said an engineer could fall out the side door and that passengers are more apt to bother the engineer when they can walk through the back door.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  NTSB schedules hearing on Chatsworth collision OPRRMS 02-10-2009 - 15:19
  What's Interesting Is What Subject Matter WON'T Be Discussed Holly Gibson 02-11-2009 - 23:05
  Re: What's Interesting Is What Subject Matter WON'T Be Discussed J 02-12-2009 - 05:31
  Re: What's Interesting Is What Subject Matter WON'T Be Discussed OPRRMS 02-12-2009 - 09:11
  A Second Person In The Cab At Rialto? I Have My Doubts Holly Gibson 02-12-2009 - 12:34
  Re: A Second Person In The Cab At Rialto? I Have My Doubts OPRRMS 02-12-2009 - 13:18
  Q. What Is A Gaffe For A PR Spokeswoman? A. When She's Telling The Truth! Holly Gibson 02-12-2009 - 13:52
  Re: Q. What Is A Gaffe For A PR Spokeswoman? A. When She's Telling The Truth! OPRRMS 02-12-2009 - 14:48
  Re: A Second Person In The Cab At Rialto? I Have My Doubts J 02-12-2009 - 13:55
  Safety Vs. Saving Money --- Guess Which Comes Out On Top? Holly Gibson 02-12-2009 - 14:08
  Re: Safety Vs. Saving Money --- Guess Which Comes Out On Top? J 02-12-2009 - 17:38
  Safety vs. Saving Money --- The Debate Continues! Holly Gibson 02-13-2009 - 05:23
  Re: Safety vs. Saving Money --- The Debate Continues! James OPsborn 02-14-2009 - 08:18
  Re: NTSB schedules hearing on Chatsworth collision Holly Gibson 02-13-2009 - 07:35
  Safety vs Money J 02-13-2009 - 08:41
  Re: NTSB schedules hearing on Chatsworth collision OldPoleBurner 02-13-2009 - 12:29
  Re: NTSB schedules hearing on Chatsworth collision James Osborn 02-14-2009 - 07:23
  The UP Loco Had A Camera -- Why Didn't The Metrolink Loco? Holly Gibson 02-14-2009 - 08:45
  Re: The UP Loco Had A Camera -- Why Didn't The Metrolink Loco? T Judah 02-14-2009 - 12:25
  Re: The UP Loco Had A Camera -- Why Didn't The Metrolink Loco? Earl Pitts 02-14-2009 - 12:34
  If You're Gonna Preach Safety, Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is Holly Gibson 02-14-2009 - 22:39
  Reference to BART collision OPRRMS 02-15-2009 - 01:42
  Reference to MARC / Amtrak collision OPRRMS 02-15-2009 - 02:10
  Re: Reference to MARC / Amtrak collision Holly Gibson 02-15-2009 - 02:55
  Re: Reference to MARC / Amtrak collision OPRRMS 02-15-2009 - 13:20
  Re: Reference to MARC / Amtrak collision T Judah 02-15-2009 - 18:06
  NJT Wreck Involving Lone Colorblind Engineer Holly Gibson 02-15-2009 - 18:25
  Similarities Between NJT and Metrolink Wrecks Holly Gibson 02-15-2009 - 18:58
  Re: Similarities Between NJT and Metrolink Wrecks OPRRMS 02-15-2009 - 21:49
  A Rush To Judgement? Holly Gibson 02-15-2009 - 22:38
  Re: A Rush To Judgement? OPRRMS 02-16-2009 - 00:06
  Re: A Rush To Judgement? Holly Gibson 02-17-2009 - 04:40
  Re: A Rush To Judgement? OPRRMS 02-17-2009 - 06:49
  Responding Part I Holly Gibson 02-20-2009 - 03:39
  Re: Responding Part I OPRRMS 02-20-2009 - 21:02
  Re: NJT Wreck Involving Lone Colorblind Engineer OPRRMS 02-15-2009 - 21:21
  Re: NJT Wreck Involving Lone Colorblind Engineer OldPoleBurner 02-16-2009 - 18:45
  Re: NJT Wreck Involving Lone Colorblind Engineer OPRRMS 02-16-2009 - 19:12
  Responding Part III Holly Gibson 02-20-2009 - 05:12
  Responding Part II Holly Gibson 02-20-2009 - 04:06
  Re: Responding Part II OPRRMS 02-20-2009 - 21:26
  Two Engineers Speak Out About Those Dreaded Cab Cars Holly Gibson 02-21-2009 - 13:29
  Responding To The Response Holly Gibson 02-24-2009 - 05:08
  Re: RE-RE-RE-RE-RE-RE-RE-RE-RE-RE-Response Joker 02-24-2009 - 08:04
  That Was A Test . . . Holly Gibson 02-24-2009 - 21:12
  Re: Why - were you worried not Holly 02-26-2009 - 18:26
  Curious -- NOT Worried Holly Gibson 02-27-2009 - 04:30
  Re: Curious -- NOT Worried not holly 02-28-2009 - 09:59
  Kids Say The Darndest Things! Holly Gibson 03-02-2009 - 17:26
  Re: Kids Say The Darndest Things! not Holly 03-02-2009 - 23:10
  We Have Arrived Holly Gibson 03-04-2009 - 08:23


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **     **  **    ** 
 **     **  **     **  **     **  ***   ***   **  **  
 **     **  **     **  **     **  **** ****    ****   
 **     **  **     **  **     **  ** *** **     **    
  **   **   **     **  **     **  **     **     **    
   ** **    **     **  **     **  **     **     **    
    ***      *******    *******   **     **     **    
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com