 |
Re: Do You Have Brain Damage?
Author: .
Date: 04-23-2022 - 01:24
. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rudi Toot Toot Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It seems to have been forgotten that all the
> anti-Trigger posts are the results of his posting
> off-topic political crapola.
>
> It seems to have been forgotten that people can
> scroll past and not make contributory commentary
> to it if they find it of no interest to them. Or
> is that asking too much? I think it's the
> latter.
>
> > This isn't to say that all the posters of
> legitimate, RR-related topics are uniformly this
> or that politically, but to say that
> considerations of their personal politics is
> beside the point for this site.
>
> This site has been known to host off-topic
> conversations. Several of these off-topic
> conversations had warning notices posted in the
> title that they were off-topic and people should
> avoid them if they weren't interested in the
> off-topic subject matter.
>
> > Railfans simply don't appreciate nor want to
> have to wade through all his political crapola
> cluttering up this discussion group while pursuing
> their RR-related interests and questions.
>
> But they don't mind wading through all the other
> off-topic subject matter that does not have a
> political bent?
>
> There's an off-topic conversation that was
> initiated on APR 18 at 10:54. Were you offended
> by that one? How did you manage to wade through
> it?
>
> There's an off-topic conversation that was
> initiated on APR 17 at 10:50. Were you offended
> by that one? How did you manage to wade through
> it?
>
> There's an off-topic conversation that was
> initiated on APR 16 at 10:15. Were you offended
> by that one? How did you manage to wade through
> it?
>
> Shall I continue? Do you need more examples?
>
> > In other words, asking why the PRR/PenCentral
> reduced the number of tracks on Horseshoe Curve
> from four to three is a legitimate question for
> this forum. Tying that track's removal into a
> nefarious plot by an alleged pedophile conspiracy
> being run out of a pizza parlor belongs on a
> cloud-cookoo land site, not here.
>
> Sounds like you're making a reference to THIS:
>
> [pedogate.world]
>
> Maybe you can explain for us those weird Instagam
> postings he made. And look at the number of
> "conspiracy theories" that have turned out later
> to be true.
[youtu.be]
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rudi Toot Toot Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It seems to have been forgotten that all the
> anti-Trigger posts are the results of his posting
> off-topic political crapola.
>
> It seems to have been forgotten that people can
> scroll past and not make contributory commentary
> to it if they find it of no interest to them. Or
> is that asking too much? I think it's the
> latter.
>
> > This isn't to say that all the posters of
> legitimate, RR-related topics are uniformly this
> or that politically, but to say that
> considerations of their personal politics is
> beside the point for this site.
>
> This site has been known to host off-topic
> conversations. Several of these off-topic
> conversations had warning notices posted in the
> title that they were off-topic and people should
> avoid them if they weren't interested in the
> off-topic subject matter.
>
> > Railfans simply don't appreciate nor want to
> have to wade through all his political crapola
> cluttering up this discussion group while pursuing
> their RR-related interests and questions.
>
> But they don't mind wading through all the other
> off-topic subject matter that does not have a
> political bent?
>
> There's an off-topic conversation that was
> initiated on APR 18 at 10:54. Were you offended
> by that one? How did you manage to wade through
> it?
>
> There's an off-topic conversation that was
> initiated on APR 17 at 10:50. Were you offended
> by that one? How did you manage to wade through
> it?
>
> There's an off-topic conversation that was
> initiated on APR 16 at 10:15. Were you offended
> by that one? How did you manage to wade through
> it?
>
> Shall I continue? Do you need more examples?
>
> > In other words, asking why the PRR/PenCentral
> reduced the number of tracks on Horseshoe Curve
> from four to three is a legitimate question for
> this forum. Tying that track's removal into a
> nefarious plot by an alleged pedophile conspiracy
> being run out of a pizza parlor belongs on a
> cloud-cookoo land site, not here.
>
> Sounds like you're making a reference to THIS:
>
> [pedogate.world]
>
> Maybe you can explain for us those weird Instagam
> postings he made. And look at the number of
> "conspiracy theories" that have turned out later
> to be true.
[youtu.be]
