Re: Transparency? Are You Sure?
Author: Margaret (SP fan)
Date: 04-24-2011 - 23:38
Conspiracy Theorist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> OldPoleBurner Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > All discovered information must be
> > included in the final report; to maintain
> total
> > transparency and to assure that a complete and
> > full context surrounding the incident, is well
> > understood.
>
> Oh really? Then, in the case of the Chatsworth
> wreck, how come NTSB investigators didn't mention
> in their final report that the electronic device
> that everyone was/is so adamently insisting that
> Engineer Sanchez was using was NOT found at the
> wreck site? Granted, trying to find such a small
> object in that jumbled heap of wreckage would have
> been a Hurculean task, but they knew the general
> area where it would be.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong:
>
> (1.) They never found it.
>
> (2.) In their final report, they never mentioned
> that they never found it.
-------------------------------------------------------
My comment:
One little tiny question I have is: IF the NTSB ever
found Sanchez's cell phone, and if it was undamaged
enough to read the "SEND" time off of it -- could that
"SEND" time possibly be earlier than that which was
recorded by the cell tower? In other words, is there
ever a delay between the time the message is sent and
the time the message is received by the cell tower?
(Just wondering if that was so -- if Sanchez's cell phone
could possibly have recorded an earlier SEND time than
that received by the cell tower. Did he possibly confine his
-- admittedly WRONG and DISTRACTING -- texting to just
the time when he was in the Chatsworth station?. He paid
for his possible mental distraction with his life and the lives of 24
other people. (Not to mention the 130 injureed passengers..)
Terrible event, just terrible.)
Margaret (SP fan)
Polite corrections and additions are always welcome!