 |
Re: Save the Internet - This means you !
Author: Mozart
Date: 01-17-2012 - 11:20
MG42 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mozart, you seem out of arguments if you must now
> resort to insults, not facts. BTW, if you credit
> the source, and aren't making a profit off of
> someone else’s work, I believe that's called "Fair
> Use." Wikipedia wouldn't exist w/o it. From Wiki-
>
> 17 U.S.C. § 107
> Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17
> U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of
> a copyrighted work, including such use by
> reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any
> other means specified by that section, for
> purposes such as criticism, comment, news
> reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for
> classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not
> an infringement of copyright. In determining
> whether the use made of a work in any particular
> case is a fair use the factors to be considered
> shall include:
> 1. the purpose and character of the use, including
> whether such use is of a commercial nature or is
> for nonprofit educational purposes;
> 2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
> 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion
> used in relation to the copyrighted work as a
> whole; and
> 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market
> for or value of the copyrighted work.
> The fact that a work is unpublished shall not
> itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding
> is made upon consideration of all the above
> factors.[1]
So, cool, publish a song, write an essay, what ever...
and sit back and watch as a bunch of people steal your work under the banner of "Fair Use".
You will whine like a pig when it's your intellectual rights that are being stolen.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mozart, you seem out of arguments if you must now
> resort to insults, not facts. BTW, if you credit
> the source, and aren't making a profit off of
> someone else’s work, I believe that's called "Fair
> Use." Wikipedia wouldn't exist w/o it. From Wiki-
>
> 17 U.S.C. § 107
> Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17
> U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of
> a copyrighted work, including such use by
> reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any
> other means specified by that section, for
> purposes such as criticism, comment, news
> reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for
> classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not
> an infringement of copyright. In determining
> whether the use made of a work in any particular
> case is a fair use the factors to be considered
> shall include:
> 1. the purpose and character of the use, including
> whether such use is of a commercial nature or is
> for nonprofit educational purposes;
> 2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
> 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion
> used in relation to the copyrighted work as a
> whole; and
> 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market
> for or value of the copyrighted work.
> The fact that a work is unpublished shall not
> itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding
> is made upon consideration of all the above
> factors.[1]
So, cool, publish a song, write an essay, what ever...
and sit back and watch as a bunch of people steal your work under the banner of "Fair Use".
You will whine like a pig when it's your intellectual rights that are being stolen.
