Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities
Author: BOB2
Date: 06-03-2014 - 19:11

Yes, it is expensive to bury things like electric lines, and quite worth it, as the major storms last year did way more than that in damage to the electrical grid alone. And, isn't it interesting that so many seem to be able to do it?

The cost difference in super cooled transmission lines is about 3 to 4 time greater, but since you get to use all of the electricity you've produced, (billions and billions of dollars worth...) you've built about the equivalent of a couple of hundred billion, in new generating capacity.....

Often big numbers tend to be used to scare people, and it works real well, given the extreme levels of innumeracy prevalent in our society.

Return on Investment and Cost Benefit analysis should be the criteria for making these decisions. Therefore, if I can borrow that 5 billion at today's 3.5% interest rates, and you save tens of billions in repairs over 30 years, it doesn't seem like such a "scary" big number each year, and doesn't add very much to the rate base.

Since the double tracking decisions seems to meet ROI and C/B criteria it should probably continue, too.

Lots of things worth doing are challenging.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Harold Stone 06-03-2014 - 09:28
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Rich Hunn 06-03-2014 - 10:04
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Matt Farnsworth 06-03-2014 - 11:22
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Rich Hunn 06-03-2014 - 12:05
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Global Reality 06-03-2014 - 15:27
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? H8Green 06-03-2014 - 16:38
  Harvest Bio-mass and Gas expelled from Politicians for power California Taxpayer 06-04-2014 - 07:15
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 12:07
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? mook 06-03-2014 - 13:02
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? mook 06-03-2014 - 14:39
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? H8Green 06-03-2014 - 16:32
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? GO LOOK AT EPA'S WEB SITE ... mook 06-03-2014 - 22:21
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? GO LOOK AT EPA'S WEB SITE ... mook 06-03-2014 - 22:41
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? California Taxpayer 06-03-2014 - 13:09
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? <:( 06-03-2014 - 13:12
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? T. J. 06-03-2014 - 20:21
  Re: Nova? BBC? Or just bull? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 21:09
  Re: No Bull ! T. J. 06-04-2014 - 18:53
  Re: Pure Bull ! BOB2 06-05-2014 - 10:38
  Build more Dams on the Columbia River!! <:( 06-03-2014 - 13:19
  Re: Build more Dams on the Columbia River!! brains 06-03-2014 - 14:01
  Re: Brains? How About Elininating Line Loss? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 16:35
  Underground Utilities pdxrailtransit 06-03-2014 - 18:18
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities BOB2 06-03-2014 - 19:11
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities david vartanoff 06-03-2014 - 19:16
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities OldPoleBurner 06-03-2014 - 20:54
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities mook 06-03-2014 - 22:38
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities Dr Zarkoff 06-04-2014 - 11:00
  Why the extra zero? Edward 06-03-2014 - 20:33
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 21:34
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? BNSF Rail Guy 06-04-2014 - 05:56
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? Global Reality 06-05-2014 - 22:02
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? chaser 06-05-2014 - 22:47
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? mook 06-06-2014 - 09:07
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? Plane Fan & Rail Nut 06-07-2014 - 07:26
  Re: Trollaphobia TROLL #7734 06-09-2014 - 15:20
  A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants WebDigger 06-03-2014 - 18:34
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants George Andrews 06-03-2014 - 19:45
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants Rich Hunn 06-04-2014 - 08:26
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants Bart Nadeau 06-04-2014 - 09:08
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants Rich Hunn 06-04-2014 - 10:49
  Obama rule covers ALL CARBON EMISSIONS, read fine print. KJL 06-04-2014 - 13:07
  Re: Obama rule covers ALL CARBON EMISSIONS, read fine print. The Polar 06-04-2014 - 17:29
  Re: Obama rule covers ALL CARBON EMISSIONS, read fine print. Dr Zarkoff 06-04-2014 - 18:51


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **      **   *******   **     **  **     **   *******  
 **  **  **  **     **   **   **   **     **  **     ** 
 **  **  **  **     **    ** **    **     **         ** 
 **  **  **   ********     ***     *********   *******  
 **  **  **         **    ** **    **     **         ** 
 **  **  **  **     **   **   **   **     **  **     ** 
  ***  ***    *******   **     **  **     **   *******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com