Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants
Author: Bart Nadeau
Date: 06-04-2014 - 09:08

Perhaps not for the heaviest industry but for up to medium heavy you can come close. For example Siemens Sacramento locomotive plant generates 80% of its total electricity needs from rooftop. Don't take it from me, read Lincoln Electric's write up here: [www.lincolnelectric.com]




Rich Hunn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dog, tail, chase!
> I think that the roof top solar is a splendid idea
> if the real cost (non-subsidized) makes sense
> in terms of savings. BUT, large scale industrial
> users (Alcoa, Nucor, et al) lack the roof area
> o provide power for very needed industries, hence
> the requirement for a grid. Even with battery
> storage even the residential user will require
> grid access at some time or the other. If you
> take
> away the subsidy that the residential user
> provides for the industrial base and force full
> costs
> on the industry you're going to put them in a very
> non-competitive situation. Probably won't need
> you working for them either. There's a balance to
> be achieved here which needs some clear heads
> to determine.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Harold Stone 06-03-2014 - 09:28
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Rich Hunn 06-03-2014 - 10:04
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Matt Farnsworth 06-03-2014 - 11:22
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Rich Hunn 06-03-2014 - 12:05
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Global Reality 06-03-2014 - 15:27
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? H8Green 06-03-2014 - 16:38
  Harvest Bio-mass and Gas expelled from Politicians for power California Taxpayer 06-04-2014 - 07:15
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 12:07
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? mook 06-03-2014 - 13:02
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? mook 06-03-2014 - 14:39
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? H8Green 06-03-2014 - 16:32
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? GO LOOK AT EPA'S WEB SITE ... mook 06-03-2014 - 22:21
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? GO LOOK AT EPA'S WEB SITE ... mook 06-03-2014 - 22:41
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? California Taxpayer 06-03-2014 - 13:09
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? <:( 06-03-2014 - 13:12
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? T. J. 06-03-2014 - 20:21
  Re: Nova? BBC? Or just bull? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 21:09
  Re: No Bull ! T. J. 06-04-2014 - 18:53
  Re: Pure Bull ! BOB2 06-05-2014 - 10:38
  Build more Dams on the Columbia River!! <:( 06-03-2014 - 13:19
  Re: Build more Dams on the Columbia River!! brains 06-03-2014 - 14:01
  Re: Brains? How About Elininating Line Loss? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 16:35
  Underground Utilities pdxrailtransit 06-03-2014 - 18:18
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities BOB2 06-03-2014 - 19:11
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities david vartanoff 06-03-2014 - 19:16
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities OldPoleBurner 06-03-2014 - 20:54
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities mook 06-03-2014 - 22:38
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities Dr Zarkoff 06-04-2014 - 11:00
  Why the extra zero? Edward 06-03-2014 - 20:33
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 21:34
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? BNSF Rail Guy 06-04-2014 - 05:56
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? Global Reality 06-05-2014 - 22:02
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? chaser 06-05-2014 - 22:47
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? mook 06-06-2014 - 09:07
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? Plane Fan & Rail Nut 06-07-2014 - 07:26
  Re: Trollaphobia TROLL #7734 06-09-2014 - 15:20
  A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants WebDigger 06-03-2014 - 18:34
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants George Andrews 06-03-2014 - 19:45
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants Rich Hunn 06-04-2014 - 08:26
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants Bart Nadeau 06-04-2014 - 09:08
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants Rich Hunn 06-04-2014 - 10:49
  Obama rule covers ALL CARBON EMISSIONS, read fine print. KJL 06-04-2014 - 13:07
  Re: Obama rule covers ALL CARBON EMISSIONS, read fine print. The Polar 06-04-2014 - 17:29
  Re: Obama rule covers ALL CARBON EMISSIONS, read fine print. Dr Zarkoff 06-04-2014 - 18:51


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  ********  **     **  **    **  ********  
 **        **        **     **  ***   **  **     ** 
 **        **        **     **  ****  **  **     ** 
 ******    ******    *********  ** ** **  ********  
 **        **        **     **  **  ****  **        
 **        **        **     **  **   ***  **        
 ********  ********  **     **  **    **  **        
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com