Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste?
Author: T. J.
Date: 06-03-2014 - 20:21

> Just build more bird killing wind mills and bird frying solar plants
> for power, that will make Barbara and her stooges happy!


Uh - NO!

Extremists that they are; they have been opposing those too - especially out in the Mojave where all the sunlight is.

But don'tyaknow, its all OK though. At least our enemies (yes Polyanna - we do have them) will never need to bomb us into the stone age. Since we will be going there with bells on, quite voluntarily; kick-marching all the way!



Too bad none this will have even the minutest effect on global warming - no matter whose politics wins, even if mankind's CO2 emissions are cut to ZERO. The Earth itself is belching enormous quantities of the stuff right out of the ground.

According to a couple of PBS programs and a BBC documentary put on about four years ago or so (one of them a Nova episode), much of the tropical Western Atlantic sea floor is emitting many thousands of tons of CO2 per year per square mile, as are many other places around the globe. The worst being two volcanoes in Africa (I forget their names - couldn't spell them anyway), which according to a Nova program on "Lake Overturn" (caused by natural CO2 emissions), are each putting out more tons of CO2 per day than the entire 200 years of industrialization did.

Now that would be quite a number! So lets see. If those estimates were even approximately correct, then 200 years * 365.25 days per year = 73050, then each day each volcano is putting out 73050 times as much CO2 as man ever did. Or in other words, each of these volcanoes is putting out 5.3 billion times more CO2 each day, than is the whole human race each day.

Put that another way, even if the politicians get rid of man's contribution entirely, it will cut total global CO2 emissions by only one ten-billionth! And that is just the emission from those two volcanoes. There are plenty more natural emissions elsewhere, which make man's efforts even smaller. Is it yet plain that these politicians are not going to "save the Earth" no matter what draconian steps they impose! Their promises to do so are therefore outright lies.

As well they should think, in their extreme pride and arrogance; that puny man is going to change the natural geological course of any planet. Whatever is gonna happen folks, and when, is already a done deal, warming or no warming! Our politicians would serve us much better by working to find ways to adapt to the inevitable, whatever it is; while there is still time (if adaptation is even possible).

But they would rather abuse global warming concerns to exercise extreme power and dominion over us - such as in the proudly declared "I'm now the most powerful woman in the world" (spoken by Speaker Nancy Pelosi on the House Floor in 2009).



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Harold Stone 06-03-2014 - 09:28
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Rich Hunn 06-03-2014 - 10:04
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Matt Farnsworth 06-03-2014 - 11:22
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Rich Hunn 06-03-2014 - 12:05
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? Global Reality 06-03-2014 - 15:27
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? H8Green 06-03-2014 - 16:38
  Harvest Bio-mass and Gas expelled from Politicians for power California Taxpayer 06-04-2014 - 07:15
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 12:07
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? mook 06-03-2014 - 13:02
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? mook 06-03-2014 - 14:39
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? H8Green 06-03-2014 - 16:32
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? GO LOOK AT EPA'S WEB SITE ... mook 06-03-2014 - 22:21
  Re: -- WOW-double track waste? Sources? GO LOOK AT EPA'S WEB SITE ... mook 06-03-2014 - 22:41
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? California Taxpayer 06-03-2014 - 13:09
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? <:( 06-03-2014 - 13:12
  Re: State of WA must reduce carbon emissions by 72% -- double track waste? T. J. 06-03-2014 - 20:21
  Re: Nova? BBC? Or just bull? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 21:09
  Re: No Bull ! T. J. 06-04-2014 - 18:53
  Re: Pure Bull ! BOB2 06-05-2014 - 10:38
  Build more Dams on the Columbia River!! <:( 06-03-2014 - 13:19
  Re: Build more Dams on the Columbia River!! brains 06-03-2014 - 14:01
  Re: Brains? How About Elininating Line Loss? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 16:35
  Underground Utilities pdxrailtransit 06-03-2014 - 18:18
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities BOB2 06-03-2014 - 19:11
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities david vartanoff 06-03-2014 - 19:16
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities OldPoleBurner 06-03-2014 - 20:54
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities mook 06-03-2014 - 22:38
  Re: Double Tracking and Underground Utilities Dr Zarkoff 06-04-2014 - 11:00
  Why the extra zero? Edward 06-03-2014 - 20:33
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? BOB2 06-03-2014 - 21:34
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? BNSF Rail Guy 06-04-2014 - 05:56
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? Global Reality 06-05-2014 - 22:02
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? chaser 06-05-2014 - 22:47
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? mook 06-06-2014 - 09:07
  Re: US "average" loss is indeed lesss? Plane Fan & Rail Nut 06-07-2014 - 07:26
  Re: Trollaphobia TROLL #7734 06-09-2014 - 15:20
  A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants WebDigger 06-03-2014 - 18:34
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants George Andrews 06-03-2014 - 19:45
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants Rich Hunn 06-04-2014 - 08:26
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants Bart Nadeau 06-04-2014 - 09:08
  Re: A guide to Obama's new rules to cut carbon emissions from power plants Rich Hunn 06-04-2014 - 10:49
  Obama rule covers ALL CARBON EMISSIONS, read fine print. KJL 06-04-2014 - 13:07
  Re: Obama rule covers ALL CARBON EMISSIONS, read fine print. The Polar 06-04-2014 - 17:29
  Re: Obama rule covers ALL CARBON EMISSIONS, read fine print. Dr Zarkoff 06-04-2014 - 18:51


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **     **  ********   **     **   ******   
 **   **   **     **  **     **  **     **  **    **  
 **  **    **     **  **     **  **     **  **        
 *****     **     **  **     **  **     **  **   **** 
 **  **     **   **   **     **   **   **   **    **  
 **   **     ** **    **     **    ** **    **    **  
 **    **     ***     ********      ***      ******   
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com