 |
Re: Where there's a will, there's a way......yes, of course it can be done.
Author: HUTCH 7.62
Date: 01-22-2018 - 19:50
John Bruce Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The problem I see is the cost per minute of
> shortened trip time, say SF to Bskersfield. The
> possible stop-the-bleeding fixes are still going
> to be pretty darn expensive. How many minutes do
> you gain by, say, lowering the Madera to
> Bakersfield ideal speed of 200 mph to a best-case
> 125 mph? Enough to make a difference? At what cost
> per minute? Do you factor in the sunk cost of the
> stranded and unused 200 mph infrastructure? What
> would be the best projections for travel time of
> SF to Bakersfield via Port Chicago and then the
> HSR route south of Madera? Ditto for a still very
> costly route SF-Dumbarton-Altamont-Madera (what do
> the ACE trains now take in time over Altamont?)
> And then compare this to the timing of current
> Amtrak San Joaquins?
>
> How might a Trumpian insurgent candidate exploit
> this by suggesting alternate extra public works
> money go to dams and water projects?
It won’t happen. The Gavin will become governornator ending 2 A rights and dumping precious fetia on illegals and welfare projects. precious water storage and infrastructure projects will get a put to the back of the line. While taxes get raised. Don’t belive me? Just go to gavin’s website. The Democratic Underground is waiting to be spoon fed by the guy.
The guy survives on anti trump rhetoric. Some of the sheeple here will eat it up. Flame suit on.
Link
-------------------------------------------------------
> The problem I see is the cost per minute of
> shortened trip time, say SF to Bskersfield. The
> possible stop-the-bleeding fixes are still going
> to be pretty darn expensive. How many minutes do
> you gain by, say, lowering the Madera to
> Bakersfield ideal speed of 200 mph to a best-case
> 125 mph? Enough to make a difference? At what cost
> per minute? Do you factor in the sunk cost of the
> stranded and unused 200 mph infrastructure? What
> would be the best projections for travel time of
> SF to Bakersfield via Port Chicago and then the
> HSR route south of Madera? Ditto for a still very
> costly route SF-Dumbarton-Altamont-Madera (what do
> the ACE trains now take in time over Altamont?)
> And then compare this to the timing of current
> Amtrak San Joaquins?
>
> How might a Trumpian insurgent candidate exploit
> this by suggesting alternate extra public works
> money go to dams and water projects?
It won’t happen. The Gavin will become governornator ending 2 A rights and dumping precious fetia on illegals and welfare projects. precious water storage and infrastructure projects will get a put to the back of the line. While taxes get raised. Don’t belive me? Just go to gavin’s website. The Democratic Underground is waiting to be spoon fed by the guy.
The guy survives on anti trump rhetoric. Some of the sheeple here will eat it up. Flame suit on.
Link
