Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: BART third rail woes
Author: david vartanoff
Date: 01-10-2009 - 11:53

yes. physically more stable, less subject to wind, lower profile infrastructure to maintain--no ladders, line cars. .

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  BART third rail woes synonymouse 01-10-2009 - 11:04
  Re: BART third rail woes david vartanoff 01-10-2009 - 11:53
  Third rail design Bill 01-10-2009 - 14:06
  Re: Third rail design railstiesballast 01-10-2009 - 19:50
  Re: Third rail design NormSchultze 01-11-2009 - 06:49
  Re: Third rail design synonymouse 01-11-2009 - 11:48
  Re: Third rail design Dr Zarkoff 01-12-2009 - 01:46
  Re: Third rail design The Montezuma Yardmaster 01-13-2009 - 17:48
  Re: Third rail design OldPoleburner 01-13-2009 - 19:35
  Re: Third rail design Dr Zarkoff 01-13-2009 - 20:17
  Re: Third rail design Al Stangenberger 01-11-2009 - 14:18
  Re: BART third rail woes Ernest H. Robl 01-11-2009 - 15:03
  Re: BART third rail woes synonymouse 01-11-2009 - 19:06
  Re: BART third rail woes The Montezuma Yardmaster 01-13-2009 - 18:08
  Re: BART third rail woes George Andrews 01-13-2009 - 19:27
  Re: BART third rail woes CWLee 01-13-2009 - 21:11
  Re: BART third rail woes The Montezuma Yardmaster 01-14-2009 - 10:22


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **    **  ********  **     **        ** 
 **     **  ***   **  **        **     **        ** 
 **     **  ****  **  **        **     **        ** 
 **     **  ** ** **  ******    **     **        ** 
  **   **   **  ****  **         **   **   **    ** 
   ** **    **   ***  **          ** **    **    ** 
    ***     **    **  ********     ***      ******
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com