Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
A Second Engineer Would Have Told Sanchez To Pound Sand
Author: Holly Gibson
Date: 03-04-2009 - 15:39

John Bruce's comments in italics
Holly Gibson's responses in normal font

OPRRMS is on the case again, I see, ready to minimize all this stuff.

Well, maybe I'll pop up here and do some maximizing!

He's said here in the past that smokin' grass on the job is impossible, since everyone gets tested.

If people have an addiction, they'll find a way. And they have websites like this to help them out:

[www.cleartest.com]

And I'm wondering how a teenager gets smuggled into a locomotive cab without anyone noticing.

You sneak him up the ladder on the side of the locomotive that's not facing the platform. The cover of darkness helps, too.

Just think, if there had been an assistant engineer up in the cab, it probably wouldn't have happened and 25 people would still be alive.

Don't you just love where I'm trying to steer this conversation! ;)

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Chatsworth revisited d 03-04-2009 - 09:46
  List of exhibits [link] OPRRMS 03-04-2009 - 11:54
  Re: List of exhibits [link] OPRRMS 03-04-2009 - 13:26
  Re: Chatsworth revisited John Bruce 03-04-2009 - 14:21
  Re: Chatsworth revisited Mike 03-04-2009 - 14:28
  A Second Engineer Would Have Told Sanchez To Pound Sand Holly Gibson 03-04-2009 - 15:39
  Re: A Second Engineer Would Have Told Sanchez To Pound Sand david vartanoff 03-04-2009 - 17:49
  Re: A Second Engineer Would Have Told Sanchez To Pound Sand WAF 03-04-2009 - 18:41
  Re: A Second Engineer Would Have Told Sanchez To Pound Sand John Galt 03-04-2009 - 19:03
  Re: A Second Engineer Would Have Told Sanchez To Pound Sand Earl 03-05-2009 - 09:50
  Re: Chatsworth revisited OPRRMS 03-04-2009 - 18:48
  This $200 Device Probably Would Have Prevented The Chatsworth Wreck Holly Gibson 03-04-2009 - 20:41
  Rules Compliance J 03-05-2009 - 05:21
  Re: Rules Compliance John Bruce 03-05-2009 - 07:50
  Re: Rules Compliance J 03-05-2009 - 10:46
  Re: Rules Compliance Ed Von Nordeck 03-05-2009 - 20:12
  Re: Rules Compliance John Bruce 03-06-2009 - 08:39
  Re: Rules Compliance Dr Zarkoff 03-06-2009 - 17:53
  Re: Rules Compliance not Zarkoff 03-07-2009 - 11:00
  Re: This $200 Device Probably Would Have Prevented The Chatsworth Wreck crmeatball 03-05-2009 - 11:44
  Re: This $200 Device Probably Would Have Prevented The Chatsworth Wreck hogger 03-05-2009 - 12:13
  Re: 'hogger' and insight Steven D. Johnson 03-05-2009 - 21:36
  Re: Chatsworth revisited Extra Board 03-05-2009 - 21:31
  Responding To Hogger Holly Gibson 03-06-2009 - 04:29
  Re: Responding To Hogger hogger 03-06-2009 - 07:14
  Re: Responding To Hogger Dr Zarkoff 03-06-2009 - 11:26
  Re: Responding To Hogger BOB2 03-06-2009 - 12:39
  Re: Responding To Hogger Dr Zarkoff 03-06-2009 - 15:29
  Re: Responding To Hogger z 03-06-2009 - 18:22
  Re: Responding To Hogger Dr Zarkoff 03-06-2009 - 18:55
  Re: Responding To Hogger OldPoleBurner 03-07-2009 - 13:34
  Re: Responding To Hogger Dr Zarkoff 03-07-2009 - 23:22
  Re: Responding To Hogger Jan van Eck 03-08-2009 - 17:38
  A Conductor Can't Be In Multiple Places Simultaneously Holly Gibson 03-12-2009 - 14:13
  Re: A Conductor Can't Be In Multiple Places Simultaneously GRRR 03-13-2009 - 10:38


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  *******    ******    ******          **  **     ** 
 **     **  **    **  **    **         **  **     ** 
        **  **        **               **  **     ** 
  *******   **        **   ****        **  **     ** 
        **  **        **    **   **    **   **   **  
 **     **  **    **  **    **   **    **    ** **   
  *******    ******    ******     ******      ***
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com