Re: OK
Author: see both sides
Date: 09-10-2010 - 15:36

Don't get my wife started on how she wishes for her union to go away (we're talking a "public service" union for the schools). This IS where the old-heads use seniority to plop into the cushy jobs with the best, and most, hours so that they can ease away their senior years doing as little as possible. On the other hand, my work duties include being a hired gun to report construction project progress to railroad management. In this, I work alongside the required railroad flagmen at the sites. At one site, the assigned flagman (who will retire when this project is done) is an old-head MOW eomployee with top seniority. This man will still sweep the site, tamp a tie, pick weeds, etc--anyting to keep busy and productive during slow periods. (Standing ovation). At another site accross town on "the other railroad", the assigned flagman (20 years or so YOUNGER) has been known to sleep the day away in his truck and wouldn't touch a tamping bar if it jumped into his handb by itself.
My personal summary--SOME unions are worthless. Some employees within the good unions get carried along by the ones who care. That SHOULD tick-off the guys who care. Sorry, but unions should NOT gaurantee a job for the brothers and sisters who are slackers, but you hear about too many instances where they do--and blame it on a management which only wants to cut costs. I'm sure that they could cut costs by eliminating waste. Just don't say that "seniority" gives a license to kick back. When I hear about ANY union protecting somebody who NEEDS to be fired, it makes me sick. Paying dues in exchange for being protected is kind of like how the mob used to operate.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Richmond Pacific today Captain Underpants 09-08-2010 - 19:16
  Re: Richmond Pacific today Juppo 09-08-2010 - 19:51
  Re: More Bad Shortlines Your grandson.. Thanks! 09-09-2010 - 01:50
  This messaage directlly above, needs to be deleated. It has no place here! Tony 09-09-2010 - 07:05
  Re: The message second above makes some very good points, just needed a little soap in mouth. Bruce Kelly 09-09-2010 - 07:49
  Re: The message second above makes some very good points, just needed a little soap in mouth. SLOCONDR 09-09-2010 - 08:33
  Re: The message second above makes some very good points, just needed a little soap in mouth. Del Monte 09-09-2010 - 08:55
  Re: soap Your grandson...Thanks! 09-09-2010 - 11:42
  Re: soap theconductor 09-09-2010 - 16:13
  Re: soap John Barnhill 09-09-2010 - 17:58
  Re: soap Your grandson...Thanks! 09-09-2010 - 17:59
  Re: soap freelancer 09-09-2010 - 20:36
  Re: soap . 09-11-2010 - 16:30
  Re: productive railroads Severe Duty 09-09-2010 - 18:48
  Re: productive railroads theconductor 09-09-2010 - 20:39
  Re: OK Severe Duty 09-09-2010 - 22:19
  Re: OK Craig Tambo 09-09-2010 - 22:47
  Re: OK UKW 09-10-2010 - 09:57
  Re: OK see both sides 09-10-2010 - 15:36
  Re: OK JHS 09-10-2010 - 20:36
  Re: OK OldPoleBurner 09-11-2010 - 17:27
  Re: Not OK Your grandson...Thanks! 09-12-2010 - 15:52
  Re: OK OPRRMS 09-10-2010 - 19:52


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **    **  **     **  **    **        ** 
 **        ***   **  ***   ***  **   **         ** 
 **        ****  **  **** ****  **  **          ** 
 ******    ** ** **  ** *** **  *****           ** 
 **        **  ****  **     **  **  **    **    ** 
 **        **   ***  **     **  **   **   **    ** 
 ********  **    **  **     **  **    **   ******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com