Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK
Author: Spanky
Date: 10-22-2011 - 14:04

I have a really big issue with sh*tty co-workers, especially those that get away with murder, yet the good guys always get the shaft. I'm an Amtrak victim of their abusive ways, still wish I was out there, because I loved my job and thought I was good at it. As Mark Meoff says, he's hardly perfect, and I agree anyone that thinks they are the sh*t has something wrong with their head. Were human, and we make mistakes, but to slam into another train and say "ah no big deal", he's lucky no one died or he'd be in worse crap than loosing ones job. I hope when #14's engineer gets better (I consider him a friend and worked many nights out of Oakland with him), that he goes on an ass kicking party for perhaps ruining his career, not for the broken arm, but the lower back issues will haunt him forever now!

This message was Spanky approved.

Yes, Cosmo will know who this is too!

Mark Meoff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey Cosmo,
>
> Or should I say Brett, Tim is not a good guy or a
> good engineer. Good engineers don't run red
> signals AND be arrogant about it. He may be a good
> friend, but that's between you two. As for myself
> I don't like him as an employee, and substandard
> would be too polite of a description of his
> abilities as an engineer. I, like everyone else,
> am not perfect. However, when I do screw up I
> don't go walking around telling everyone that it's
> their problem and not mine. He's got student
> engineer evaluations a mile long that all say he
> should never be marked up as an engineer.
> Management knew and still knows he's a bad
> engineer but refused to do anything about it.
>
> Now, as for how the switch was lined at the time
> of the incident, yes it was lined for the inside
> track. The signal and switch was "in time" and was
> a few minutes away from lining up for 717. The DS
> had 14 lined up for departure when 717 showed up
> in his territory. The DS took the signal and
> lineup down from 14 and "ran time" on the switch
> so that 717 could be lined up. This is a normal
> operation and has been handled well by countless
> other engineers.
>
> As for the "what if" PTC would have helped in this
> situation, answer is yes. The on board computer
> would have seen that 717 was approaching the
> signal way too fast and stopped it.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Jon 10-12-2011 - 22:38
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Jon 10-12-2011 - 22:45
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Don 10-12-2011 - 23:20
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK EOM674A 10-12-2011 - 23:41
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Jon 10-13-2011 - 00:04
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Mark Meoff 10-13-2011 - 00:22
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK stash 10-13-2011 - 00:27
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Tie Plate 10-13-2011 - 01:22
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Gene Poon 10-13-2011 - 09:23
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Espee99 10-13-2011 - 11:47
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK OPRRMS 10-13-2011 - 13:55
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK EOM674A 10-13-2011 - 13:55
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Hannibal Katt 10-13-2011 - 15:49
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Dr Zarkoff 10-13-2011 - 15:53
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Gene Poon 10-13-2011 - 16:20
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Mark Meoff 10-13-2011 - 16:30
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Gene Poon 10-13-2011 - 16:37
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK OPRRMS 10-13-2011 - 16:42
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK WAF 10-13-2011 - 17:44
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Dr Zarkoff 10-13-2011 - 18:07
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Outsider 10-13-2011 - 18:25
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Cosmo 10-13-2011 - 18:36
  Re: positive train control Tony 10-13-2011 - 19:05
  Re: positive train control Dr Zarkoff 10-13-2011 - 19:13
  Re: positive train control COLLEX AKA COLLISION EXPERT 10-14-2011 - 13:37
  Re: positive train control Jascha 10-14-2011 - 14:32
  Re: positive train control OldPoleBurner 10-14-2011 - 16:34
  Re: positive train control COLLEX AKA COLLISION EXPERT 10-14-2011 - 20:36
  Re: positive train control Dr Zarkoff 10-14-2011 - 21:19
  Re: positive train control OPRRMS 10-14-2011 - 21:50
  Re: positive train control COLLEX AKA COLLISION EXPERT 10-14-2011 - 23:18
  Re: positive train control Dr Zarkoff 10-15-2011 - 10:19
  Re: positive train control COLLEX AKA COLLISION EXPERT 10-15-2011 - 12:57
  Re: positive train control COLLEX AKA COLLISION EXPERT 10-15-2011 - 14:19
  Re: positive train control OPRRMS 10-15-2011 - 14:31
  Re: positive train control Dr Zarkoff 10-15-2011 - 16:40
  Re: positive train control Dr Zarkoff 10-15-2011 - 17:00
  Re: positive train control Time Span 10-16-2011 - 05:55
  Re: positive train control Dr Zarkoff 10-16-2011 - 10:33
  Re: positive train control OPRRMS 10-16-2011 - 13:54
  Re: positive train control Dr Zarkoff 10-16-2011 - 16:59
  Re: positive train control OPRRMS 10-14-2011 - 18:25
  Re: positive train control OPRRMS 10-14-2011 - 19:26
  Re: positive train control Mark Meoff 10-14-2011 - 23:25
  Re: positive train control Dr Zarkoff 10-14-2011 - 17:34
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Mark Meoff 10-13-2011 - 19:44
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK LKK 10-13-2011 - 22:22
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK OPRRMS 10-13-2011 - 22:28
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK LKK 10-13-2011 - 22:54
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK OPRRMS 10-14-2011 - 09:54
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK OPRRMS 10-14-2011 - 14:58
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Eric Rasmussen 10-14-2011 - 16:46
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK John Horren 10-15-2011 - 09:12
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Espee99 10-14-2011 - 06:29
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Outsider 10-14-2011 - 05:17
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK NNN 10-14-2011 - 01:52
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK COLLEX AKA COLLISION EXPERT 10-14-2011 - 05:52
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Mitch 10-14-2011 - 06:51
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Cosmo 10-14-2011 - 08:00
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Jesse 10-14-2011 - 08:31
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK COLLEX AKA COLLISION EXPERT 10-14-2011 - 11:13
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK theconductor 10-15-2011 - 10:38
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK SP5103 10-14-2011 - 09:58
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Mark Meoff 10-14-2011 - 16:54
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Dr Zarkoff 10-14-2011 - 17:42
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Herbert B 10-15-2011 - 09:18
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Spanky 10-22-2011 - 14:04
  Re: Head-on 2 Amtraks at OAK Kanra 10-14-2011 - 22:07
  Re:signal location question Severe Duty 10-15-2011 - 01:30
  Re: Re:signal location question OPRRMS 10-15-2011 - 02:29
  Re: Re:signal location question OldPoleBurner 10-15-2011 - 21:31
  Re: Re:signal location question OPRRMS 10-15-2011 - 22:35
  Re: Re:signal location question SP5103 10-16-2011 - 21:33
  Re: Re:signal location question theconductor 10-16-2011 - 22:39
  MSM MTM 10-15-2011 - 12:09
  Re: MSM Dr Zarkoff 10-15-2011 - 16:42
  Re: MSM MTM 10-15-2011 - 20:27


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
       **  **     **   ******         **        ** 
       **  **     **  **    **        **        ** 
       **  **     **  **              **        ** 
       **  **     **  **              **        ** 
 **    **  **     **  **        **    **  **    ** 
 **    **  **     **  **    **  **    **  **    ** 
  ******    *******    ******    ******    ******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com