What the . . .??? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MeMyselfAndEye Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So wait a minute...Dr. Zarkoff and What the...?
> > are one-in-the same people? Okay, whatever....
>
> Nope. Not sure how you came to that conclusion,
> but you'd make a piss-poor cop. But I'm flattered
> that you think so.
>
> > Your understanding of the "facts" regarding
> Rush's
> > case is incorrect. First of all, the event in
> 2006
> > is NOT as you describe. The FACTS of this
> incident
> > are that Rush traveled out of country on his
> > private jet. I'm not going to Google this and
> look
> > up the facts
>
> OK, let's Google "rush limbaugh drug bust," and
> see what we get. Hmmm, 75 pages of links related
> to it. Here's the very first one, a story from
> The Washington Post titled "Rush Limbaugh Turns
> Himself In On Fraud Charge In Rx Drug Probe."
> [www.washingtonpost.com]
> le/2006/04/28/AR2006042801692.html So you're
> saying the Post got it all wrong? What about the
> other 74 links? If that's the case, then your
> beef should be with the media, not Dr. Zarkoff and
> me. Maybe you should start a campaign to Save
> Rush.
>
> >(because I'm getting bored to be
> > quite honest), but off the top of my head I
> think
> > this occurred at a small, private airport.
> There
> > are a lot of politics that went on with the
> > District Attorney in this case, and if you
> examine
> > things closely, you will see that Rush was
> treated
> > much differently (harsher) than the average
> Joe.
> > The DA was out to get Rush---at any cost. On
> that
> > day in 2006, the DA directed his buddy at
> Customs
> > to go and setup a whole slew of people in a
> > private hangar to pull a surprise on Rush, and
> go
> > through everything with a fine tooth comb. This
> > was highly unusual and completely out of the
> > ordinary. As the Federal goons searched through
> > Rush's personal possessions, those of his
> > passengers, and through his entire private jet,
> > they found ONE bottle of Viagra that had
> someone
> > else's name on it. That bottle of Viagra
> belonged
> > to Rush, and the name on the label was his
> "stage
> > name" that he uses so that the tabloids won't
> get
> > a hold of what he, as a private citizen, does
> in
> > the privacy of his own home. It was NOT illegal
> > what took place that day for Rush to be in
> > possession of Viagra in someone else's name. He
> > was on probation at the time, and if anything
> > illegal was taking place, he would have been
> > arrested. Nothing happened out of that incident
> > because nothing illegal was going on---just
> more
> > harassment by the government of a private
> citizen.
> > For you to bend that into something else is
> being
> > very intellectually dishonest.
>
> As stated in the Post article I linked for you
> above, the "spokesman for the state's attorney's
> office, Mike Edmondson, said the agreement
> dropping the charge is "standard for first-time
> offenders who admit their addiction." So he
> received what anyone else would've in the same
> situation. He wasn't setup or targeted as you
> claim.
> >
> > Af far as Rush fighting the DA every step of
> the
> > way, you're damn right I'm glad he did that.
> I'm
> > glad for him, and I'm glad for all of us as
> well.
> > It is none of the government's business to see
> > what we have in our personal medical files,
>
> But it's OK for a cop to demand to see the vehicle
> driver license of a railroad engineer, even though
> it's expressly prohibited by law?
>
> > and the DA was once again playing dirty and
> playing
> > political because he was out to get Rush from
> the
> > beginning. Rush has the money and resources to
> > fight this, and I'm sure if you were in a
> similar
> > situation, you would fight it as well. Again,
> for
> > you to twist this into something else is being
> > completely dishonest as to the facts that took
> > place. Perhaps if you LISTENED to his program
> and
> > stopped reading things that other people write
> > about him, you would be more informed.
>
> Should I also, then, stop reading what you write
> about him? I hope not, because it's so
> entertaining!
>
> > Rush got hooked on painkillers, admitted the
> > mistake, got treatment, and in the end he took
> a
> > plea deal and was put on probation. So what the
> > hell is your point?
>
> My point is that he's just another "Shock Jock"
> who uses the power of the airwaves to spread his
> so-called message. Most people don't fall for it,
> but some people, like you, do. Otherwise, why
> would you be so intent on defending him?

Hah hah hah!!! You are a lunatic dude. Get a life man!! Thanks for the great laugh. I needed some entertainment tonight.