Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver.
Author: Holly Gibson
Date: 01-30-2012 - 14:59

Wow...90 seconds. That's enough time to wait patiently, then wonder where the train is, soon become annoyed, begin to consider doing something risky, then making the decision to do just that out of pure, hot frustration.

If the motorist became impatient because the gates came down too soon, that would have given him the perfect opportunity to reach for his personal electronic device and start text messaging his frustrations to everyone on his Facebook friends list. He would have been illegally texting, but he'd still be alive.

So now it's not enough to have flashing red lights, gates and ringing bells to stop motorists. Such devices now have to be finely tuned in their activation so as not to annoy motorists and deprive them of their patience if they're activated for too long.

Yeah, it's everyone's fault buy the motorist!

Sheesh!



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Severe Duty 01-29-2012 - 13:27
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. ATSF Asbel 01-29-2012 - 14:43
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. P. Kepler 01-29-2012 - 18:28
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Severe Duty 01-29-2012 - 18:58
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. OldPoleBurner 01-29-2012 - 21:12
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Paul Kepler 01-29-2012 - 22:20
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. theconductor 01-30-2012 - 10:38
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Holly Gibson 01-30-2012 - 14:59
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Severe Duty 01-31-2012 - 07:38
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Richard W. 01-30-2012 - 12:15
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. theconductor 01-30-2012 - 16:14
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. The Montezuma Yardmaster 01-29-2012 - 21:27
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. KI6WDX 01-30-2012 - 10:33
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Scott Schiechl 01-30-2012 - 12:55
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Plato 01-30-2012 - 13:39
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Sparks 01-30-2012 - 14:53
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. DCA 01-30-2012 - 22:10
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. KI6WDX 01-31-2012 - 10:04
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Mike Swanson 01-31-2012 - 17:26
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. KI6WDX 02-01-2012 - 10:41
  Components of Darwin Candidacy JH2Y 01-31-2012 - 17:37


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **    **  ********   **      **        ** 
 **     **  ***   **  **     **  **  **  **        ** 
 **     **  ****  **  **     **  **  **  **        ** 
 **     **  ** ** **  ********   **  **  **        ** 
 **     **  **  ****  **         **  **  **  **    ** 
 **     **  **   ***  **         **  **  **  **    ** 
  *******   **    **  **          ***  ***    ******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com