Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver.
Author: Severe Duty
Date: 01-31-2012 - 07:38

Holly Gibson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wow...90 seconds. That's enough time to wait
> patiently, then wonder where the train is, soon
> become annoyed, begin to consider doing something
> risky, then making the decision to do just that
> out of pure, hot frustration.
>
> If the motorist became impatient because the gates
> came down too soon, that would have given him the
> perfect opportunity to reach for his personal
> electronic device and start text messaging his
> frustrations to everyone on his Facebook friends
> list. He would have been illegally texting, but
> he'd still be alive.
>
> So now it's not enough to have flashing red
> lights, gates and ringing bells to stop motorists.
> Such devices now have to be finely tuned in their
> activation so as not to annoy motorists and
> deprive them of their patience if they're
> activated for too long.
>
> Yeah, it's everyone's fault buy the motorist!
>
> Sheesh!

Don't misunderstand me. It is not in defense of any driver who makes that bad choice. The point is simply as I put it, and I suspect that is what wound up happening. It's not any more than that.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Severe Duty 01-29-2012 - 13:27
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. ATSF Asbel 01-29-2012 - 14:43
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. P. Kepler 01-29-2012 - 18:28
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Severe Duty 01-29-2012 - 18:58
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. OldPoleBurner 01-29-2012 - 21:12
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Paul Kepler 01-29-2012 - 22:20
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. theconductor 01-30-2012 - 10:38
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Holly Gibson 01-30-2012 - 14:59
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Severe Duty 01-31-2012 - 07:38
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Richard W. 01-30-2012 - 12:15
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. theconductor 01-30-2012 - 16:14
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. The Montezuma Yardmaster 01-29-2012 - 21:27
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. KI6WDX 01-30-2012 - 10:33
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Scott Schiechl 01-30-2012 - 12:55
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Plato 01-30-2012 - 13:39
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Sparks 01-30-2012 - 14:53
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. DCA 01-30-2012 - 22:10
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. KI6WDX 01-31-2012 - 10:04
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Mike Swanson 01-31-2012 - 17:26
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. KI6WDX 02-01-2012 - 10:41
  Components of Darwin Candidacy JH2Y 01-31-2012 - 17:37


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **      **  **     **  **     **  **     ** 
 **     **  **  **  **  **     **  ***   ***   **   **  
 **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **** ****    ** **   
 **     **  **  **  **  *********  ** *** **     ***    
 **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **     **    ** **   
 **     **  **  **  **  **     **  **     **   **   **  
 ********    ***  ***   **     **  **     **  **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com