Re: Santa Cruz / Sierra Northern
Author: SP5103
Date: 04-02-2012 - 18:28

This doesn't have to do with the failed agreement Santa Cruz that was never consumated, but the original agreement with UP to operate the line. They now have to apply to discontinue service. It is all a matter of crossing your i's and dotting your t's.

[www.stb.dot.gov]

Although Sierra has requested revocation, we need not determine whether it has met the criteria to obtain it, because, as a common carrier currently operating on the Line, Sierra is relying on the wrong statutory standard to exit from the Line. To be relieved of the common carrier obligation to serve shippers on the Line, Sierra must obtain Board approval in the form of discontinuance authority, not revocation authority. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 10903 and 49 C.F.R. pt. 1152, a carrier that intends to discontinue service must file an application seeking prior approval by the Board. In some circumstances, a carrier may seek exemption from the prior approval requirements of § 10903 by instead filing a petition for exemption to discontinue service pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 10502 and 49 C.F.R. § 1152.60, or a notice of exemption to discontinue service under 49 C.F.R. § 1152.50. If Sierra wishes to be relieved of its common carrier obligation, it must avail itself of these Board procedures specific to discontinuances.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Santa Cruz / Sierra Northern Rich Hunn 04-02-2012 - 18:12
  Re: Santa Cruz / Sierra Northern SP5103 04-02-2012 - 18:28
  Re: Santa Cruz / Sierra Northern Howard 04-02-2012 - 19:24
  Re: Santa Cruz / Sierra Northern Tie Plate 04-02-2012 - 19:57
  Re: Santa Cruz / Sierra Northern Excellent News 04-02-2012 - 20:26
  Excellent News Howard 04-02-2012 - 20:29
  Re: Excellent News Neal Coonerty's friend 04-03-2012 - 17:23
  Re: Excellent News mook 04-03-2012 - 18:00
  Re: Excellent News Tie Plate 04-03-2012 - 23:24
  @ Tie Plate Howard 04-04-2012 - 08:29
  Yard limits?? grandpachoochoo 04-04-2012 - 11:26
  Re: Yard limits?? Howard 04-04-2012 - 11:41
  Re: Yard limits?? OPRRMS 04-04-2012 - 12:41
  @ OPRRMS – Re: Yard limits?? Howard 04-04-2012 - 13:33
  Re: @ OPRRMS – Re: Yard limits?? theconductor 04-04-2012 - 15:35
  Re: @ OPRRMS – Re: Yard limits?? Guest Rider 04-04-2012 - 16:23
  Re: @ OPRRMS – Re: Yard limits?? theconductor 04-04-2012 - 18:16
  Re: @ OPRRMS – Re: Yard limits?? OPRRMS 04-05-2012 - 09:49
  Re: @ OPRRMS – Re: Yard limits?? Howard 04-05-2012 - 10:46
  Re: @ OPRRMS – Re: Yard limits?? OPRRMS 04-05-2012 - 14:29
  Re: Excellent News Joe Magruder 04-04-2012 - 14:52
  Re: Excellent News RWS 04-04-2012 - 15:51
  Re: Excellent News theconductor 04-04-2012 - 18:15


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **    **  **    **  **    **        ** 
 **    **  ***   **  **   **   ***   **        ** 
     **    ****  **  **  **    ****  **        ** 
    **     ** ** **  *****     ** ** **        ** 
   **      **  ****  **  **    **  ****  **    ** 
   **      **   ***  **   **   **   ***  **    ** 
   **      **    **  **    **  **    **   ******  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com