Re: To Subsidize Or Not To Subsidize-Cost Benefit????
Author: curious
Date: 09-13-2012 - 15:53
Non-Partisan, Non-Party Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The real issue is the Government-Corporation
> duopoly that has America by the short hairs. Reds
> and Blues are simply the same
> Government-Corporation duopoly keeping you
> occupied with non-issues while they fleece you to
> fund their constantly-for-maximum-profits
> co-operation. If you vote for either party, you
> are part of the problem. Our republic was founded
> on representation, not on the reigning party
> duopoly. The only thing that changes when we
> shift from one administration to another is who
> gets subsidized and who gets taxed more, or vice
> versa. We must break the party system, return to
> individually representative government, fund
> essential services and the vote on what we choose
> to support or not support. End all subsidies,
> implement a flat tax, and return to a truly
> representative government. And while we're at it,
> end all corporate welfare, ensure those who
> receive welfare also work for it, help only the
> truly needy, not those who simply choose to live
> on the dole, and set term limits; as in, serve any
> one office only once, no running for a second
> term, and enforced terms of private sector
> employment between political terms. That way
> representatives can stay in touch with reality,
> not turn into fat cat career politicians. Just my
> $0.02 worth.
Isn't it amazing that people don't realize that we are a republic and that means we follow rules of law and not what some wanna-be thinks is best.America is a republic and the sooner people embrace this fact and demand that our government do it's job... protecting our nation from it's enemies. This protection does not include free cell phones,free food,free rent or subsidized transportation.