 |
Re: That claim is "will" and then "is", and then it is all "we, we, we," meaning the pigs at the ethanol trough, so much for "spin"....?
Author: BOB2
Date: 04-16-2019 - 07:42
"Is" cleaner? Or, "will be" cleaner, because of these "coming" changes in the manufacture of ethanol? Which is it? Or is it just some spin for the "true believers", coming out of both sides of his mouth?
This couldn't possibly just be the latest "spin" from an ethanol industry flack?
Not so fast? Really?
Will they be reducing the greenhouse gas "footprint" of the ethanol "manufacturing process", or is there an actual breakdown, on how much "shipping" ethanol via rail and truck, using diesel, will add to the total carbon footprint?
I am with my old pal Barry. Who pointed this problem out many years ago when analyzing the transport costs. And, came to the conclusion, that it would be better for the environment and air quality, if we drank all of that ethanol, instead of burning it in our cars. Because, of all of the fuel we'd save, and the lower emissions and cleaner air that would result, since we would all be too drunk to drive.....
This couldn't possibly just be the latest "spin" from an ethanol industry flack?
Not so fast? Really?
Will they be reducing the greenhouse gas "footprint" of the ethanol "manufacturing process", or is there an actual breakdown, on how much "shipping" ethanol via rail and truck, using diesel, will add to the total carbon footprint?
I am with my old pal Barry. Who pointed this problem out many years ago when analyzing the transport costs. And, came to the conclusion, that it would be better for the environment and air quality, if we drank all of that ethanol, instead of burning it in our cars. Because, of all of the fuel we'd save, and the lower emissions and cleaner air that would result, since we would all be too drunk to drive.....
