BOB2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Actually, part of sea level rise from warming
> oceans is because warmer water is less dense than
> cold water. Not that this scientific evidence
> will really mean that much to some folks...
>
> Here's a source I tend to find a bit more
> reliable. I spent the last dozen years going to
> those free Von Karmin series lectures at JPL and
> Cal Tech. Bill Patzert's annual climate lectures
> are available on-line, too.
>
> JPL webiste on oceanic warming and sea level
> changes.
>
> Von Karmin Lectures link
>
> Thank goodness we're in CA, where we only have a
> few examples of infrastructure at risk, like at
> San Clemente, and the north bay tidal flats, from
> this observed slow inexorable near-term rise which
> will occur in sea levels over the next century.
>
> Whereas, you have whole parts of the Gulf Coast
> that have hundreds and hundreds of examples of
> infrastructure (highway, rail, flood control,
> sewage systems, harbors, etc.) already at risk
> from more tidal flooding. Now, double down on
> that risk, by the added potential for additional
> storm damage from weather related events like
> hurricanes, which will push that higher water even
> further inland.
>
> Meanwhile, those evil hydrogen trains in Redlands
> swill just cause more of that evil dihydrogen
> monoxide to be formed, creating even more
> potential sea level rise, right?


How much is the hydrogen lobby paying you?