LongLiveSP Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BOB2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Actually, part of sea level rise from warming
> > oceans is because warmer water is less dense
> than
> > cold water. Not that this scientific evidence
> > will really mean that much to some folks...
> >
> > Here's a source I tend to find a bit more
> > reliable. I spent the last dozen years going
> to
> > those free Von Karmin series lectures at JPL
> and
> > Cal Tech. Bill Patzert's annual climate
> lectures
> > are available on-line, too.
> >
> > JPL webiste on oceanic warming and sea level
> > changes.
> >
> > Von Karmin Lectures link
> >
> > Thank goodness we're in CA, where we only have
> a
> > few examples of infrastructure at risk, like at
> > San Clemente, and the north bay tidal flats,
> from
> > this observed slow inexorable near-term rise
> which
> > will occur in sea levels over the next century.
>
> >
> > Whereas, you have whole parts of the Gulf Coast
> > that have hundreds and hundreds of examples of
> > infrastructure (highway, rail, flood control,
> > sewage systems, harbors, etc.) already at risk
> > from more tidal flooding. Now, double down on
> > that risk, by the added potential for
> additional
> > storm damage from weather related events like
> > hurricanes, which will push that higher water
> even
> > further inland.
> >
> > Meanwhile, those evil hydrogen trains in
> Redlands
> > swill just cause more of that evil dihydrogen
> > monoxide to be formed, creating even more
> > potential sea level rise, right?
>
>
> How much is the hydrogen lobby paying you?

How much does Putin pay the TOMN to troll AP?