Re: What about the discussion board?
Author: Anonymous User
Date: 07-01-2010 - 13:17
Mongo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay, that did slip my mind---my apologies on
> that. But I beg to differ on ignoring and/or
> remaining silent. In your own words, you say that
> you refrained from commenting. THAT is ignoring,
> and that's probably why I forgot. Since others had
> the same questions that I did, the comment
> inserted into a thread over three months ago was
> probably not seen by most people since it was
> never really "announced" as everything else was.
> So just to be clear, as I understand things, you
> have ZERO interest in keeping the board around as
> long as there is no Altamont Press Timetable
> business. If the Timetable business goes, so does
> the discussion board. If I'm understanding that
> correctly, that's a shame. But we'll live.
Please remember that Altamont Press doesn't exist to operate a discussion board. It's just something Rob started and I've continued. To say I have zero interest in operating the discussion board probably isn't accurate. But Altamont Press is about publishing timetables to me.
As I indicated in my reply to you last March, I have doubts this discussion board can be preserved anyway once the business closes down. It's something I would have to discuss with a lawyer.
> Of course I know that the "new rules" were put
> into place because of my comments about
> Trainorders. What bothers me is that you had to
> set new rules (into, by your own admission, a
> dying forum), instead of contacting me directly
> and telling me to knock it off.
I hate to ask the obvious, but how would I contact you directly?
Up until a month ago, I had no idea who you were. I figured it out by pulling IP addresses and seeing other usernames you've posted under. And even then, I still don't know how to reach you.
David