 |
Re: Amtrak feeds Diabetic Passenger
Author: Q
Date: 07-04-2007 - 11:44
In The know? Maybe this? Maybe that? Maybe, Maybe, Maybe!
What is this, "The May Be News Network"!
Go back and re-read the CBS 5 news article. It is inconsistant within its own self - nearly incoherent. They conveniently failed to mention that the suspect was handed over to the police by a waiting amtrak conductor. It was the police that lost him! The reporter forgot to mention any of this, but it can be deduced between the lines.
So who mentioned the notion of leaving him to the wolves - or was it the police that were being referred to as wolves. And was that an honest misimpression by a non-critically thinking reader (as so many now are in our dummied down society) or was it actually bias from the anti-amtrak/passenger train crowd.
As to Mr. Scamtrack's assertion that there was "Groping" involved; Was he there? Did he see it himself. Where did he get that from - it wasn't in any news report I've seen. If he was an eyewitness, why did'nt he just say so, or was it just more hearsay? So did a man in a diabetic stupor fall down, onto a sitting woman's lap, thus ....
We really don't know anything much about this story except for the very obvious fact that crappy reporting and biased thinking has again occurred. Thanks CBS. Didn't someone back in the thread mention the new media motto "See BS on CBS" Ha Ha.
It actually ain't so funny.
So many stories in the media are so obviously flawed in the same way this one is. Even Dan Rather himself got "fired" for "getting caught" falsifying stories. What if he hadn't gotten caught - most aren't? But we have to (HAVE TO) rely on these crappy sources to figure out who to vote for. Its actually scary - we will probably be led to vote against our own beliefs or interests by mistake if we are not really careful. Better watch out.
What is this, "The May Be News Network"!
Go back and re-read the CBS 5 news article. It is inconsistant within its own self - nearly incoherent. They conveniently failed to mention that the suspect was handed over to the police by a waiting amtrak conductor. It was the police that lost him! The reporter forgot to mention any of this, but it can be deduced between the lines.
So who mentioned the notion of leaving him to the wolves - or was it the police that were being referred to as wolves. And was that an honest misimpression by a non-critically thinking reader (as so many now are in our dummied down society) or was it actually bias from the anti-amtrak/passenger train crowd.
As to Mr. Scamtrack's assertion that there was "Groping" involved; Was he there? Did he see it himself. Where did he get that from - it wasn't in any news report I've seen. If he was an eyewitness, why did'nt he just say so, or was it just more hearsay? So did a man in a diabetic stupor fall down, onto a sitting woman's lap, thus ....
We really don't know anything much about this story except for the very obvious fact that crappy reporting and biased thinking has again occurred. Thanks CBS. Didn't someone back in the thread mention the new media motto "See BS on CBS" Ha Ha.
It actually ain't so funny.
So many stories in the media are so obviously flawed in the same way this one is. Even Dan Rather himself got "fired" for "getting caught" falsifying stories. What if he hadn't gotten caught - most aren't? But we have to (HAVE TO) rely on these crappy sources to figure out who to vote for. Its actually scary - we will probably be led to vote against our own beliefs or interests by mistake if we are not really careful. Better watch out.
