Go to: Message List•New Topic•Search
Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver.
Author: OldPoleBurner
Date: 01-29-2012 - 21:12

Sadly - Impatience or not - mother nature accepts no excuses......
- whether we like it or not!

While dropping the gates 90 seconds before arrival at the crossing might seem a long time - how long does it take to be sure everyone actually stops be arrival? The federally mandated minimum of 25 seconds is often not enough time to do that.

What I don't understand, is how do you drive around the gates with a high curb in the middle of the street to prevent just that - that's supposed to be a part of all quiet zone crossings. Is it missing here?

Navigate: Previous Message•Next Message
Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message


Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Severe Duty 01-29-2012 - 13:27
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. ATSF Asbel 01-29-2012 - 14:43
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. P. Kepler 01-29-2012 - 18:28
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Severe Duty 01-29-2012 - 18:58
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. OldPoleBurner 01-29-2012 - 21:12
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Paul Kepler 01-29-2012 - 22:20
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. theconductor 01-30-2012 - 10:38
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Holly Gibson 01-30-2012 - 14:59
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Severe Duty 01-31-2012 - 07:38
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Richard W. 01-30-2012 - 12:15
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. theconductor 01-30-2012 - 16:14
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. The Montezuma Yardmaster 01-29-2012 - 21:27
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. KI6WDX 01-30-2012 - 10:33
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Scott Schiechl 01-30-2012 - 12:55
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Plato 01-30-2012 - 13:39
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Sparks 01-30-2012 - 14:53
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. DCA 01-30-2012 - 22:10
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. KI6WDX 01-31-2012 - 10:04
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. Mike Swanson 01-31-2012 - 17:26
  Re: Sacramento Light Rail proves too heavy for this driver. KI6WDX 02-01-2012 - 10:41
  Components of Darwin Candidacy JH2Y 01-31-2012 - 17:37


Go to: Message List•Search
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **      **  **     **  **    **   ******   **    ** 
 **  **  **  ***   ***  ***   **  **    **   **  **  
 **  **  **  **** ****  ****  **  **          ****   
 **  **  **  ** *** **  ** ** **  **           **    
 **  **  **  **     **  **  ****  **           **    
 **  **  **  **     **  **   ***  **    **     **    
  ***  ***   **     **  **    **   ******      **
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com