Re: Retainers
Author: OPRRMS
Date: 03-23-2012 - 13:36

Dr Zarkoff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dynamic brake effort is a function of the traction
> motor characteristics and engine weight (on
> drivers). The 1127 is approximately the weight of
> a GP7/GP9, and the traction motors are the same
> (traction motor cooling air ducting is different).
> In dynamic, all you can do is regulate the current
> generated, not the voltage, and the max current
> for dynamics is around 750. So the retarding
> capabilities are approximately the same. I've run
> the 1127 on the SP several times. The first time,
> the dynamics hadn't been turned off, and it's a
> little disconcerting to have that fan turning so
> fast right in front of the windshield. The next
> few times I ran it, the dynamics had been turned
> off (most of these cow units had already had this
> done). Where the 1127 is "smaller" is in pulling
> power and speed because the diesel engine has
> fewer cylinders.

Oakland starting disabling the dynamics on the units that landed there in the mid-Seventies because of GRA issues.

The 1127 (and 1228) weighed 229,340 pounds when built, making those two heavier than the other Pacific Lines SW8's/TR6A's, which all weighed between 207,000 and 212,000 pounds. The relatively light weight tended to make them slippery. On the other hand, the four T&NO SW8's weight 233,000 pounds. For comparison, SP's freight GP9's weighed in the 249,000 to 256,000 pound range.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Retainers Mike Stimpson 03-22-2012 - 09:14
  Re: Retainers SP5103 03-22-2012 - 10:08
  Re: Retainers ES 03-22-2012 - 11:52
  Re: Retainers SP5103 03-22-2012 - 12:12
  Re: Retainers Severe Duty 03-22-2012 - 12:19
  Re: Retainers SP5103 03-22-2012 - 12:31
  Re: Road Foremen Severe Duty 03-22-2012 - 12:39
  Re: Retainers Dr Zarkoff 03-22-2012 - 15:57
  Re: Retainers Severe Duty 03-22-2012 - 12:14
  Re: Retainers SP5103 03-22-2012 - 12:22
  Re: Retainers <\0/> 03-22-2012 - 13:14
  Re: Retainers Rich Hunn 03-22-2012 - 14:52
  Re: Retainers George Andrews 03-22-2012 - 18:52
  Re: Retainers Graham Buxton 03-22-2012 - 19:29
  Re: Retainers SP5103 03-22-2012 - 19:59
  Re: Retainers Dr Zarkoff 03-22-2012 - 21:42
  Re: Retainers SP5103 03-22-2012 - 22:21
  Re: Retainers Craig Tambo 03-22-2012 - 21:57
  Re: Retainers Shortline Sammie 03-23-2012 - 07:42
  Re: Retainers SP5103 03-23-2012 - 08:23
  Re: Retainers Dr Zarkoff 03-23-2012 - 10:57
  Re: Retainers OPRRMS 03-23-2012 - 13:36
  Re: Retainers J.B.Bane 03-23-2012 - 15:23
  Re: Retainers SP5103 03-23-2012 - 19:28
  Re: Retainers SP5103 03-23-2012 - 18:11


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **    **  ********  **     **  **     ** 
    **     **   **      **     **     **   **   **  
    **     **  **       **     **     **    ** **   
    **     *****        **     *********     ***    
    **     **  **       **     **     **    ** **   
    **     **   **      **     **     **   **   **  
    **     **    **     **     **     **  **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com