Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch
Author: mook
Date: 01-06-2012 - 17:10

Of the shippers you mentioned, only one is not in Watsonville. Now that UP has taken the line back, I would expect an embargo or surcharge on work past Watsonville that renders shipments there uneconomic. Sad, but almost certainly true. I also lived in SC area at one time, and still have family there - the railroad is part of the atmosphere. But from an economic standpoint it's even deader than NWP; SC politically and economically is definitely not an area that will support industrial or commercial activity that requires rail service. S.End of NWP at least had several large feed/lumber operations that were potential (and now actual) sources for near-daily traffic, and the at-least-partially-funded prospect of a public agency upgrading & maintaining the line for commuter service (probably reducing maintenance costs). Outside of Watsonville (i.e. local switching off Watsonville Jct. by UP) that doesn't exist in SC absent the cement plant. Even the old feed mill (or whatever that place was at 17th Ave. that had just gone out of business when I lived there) is gone. So unless the County somehow can go through with the purchase anyway - perhaps teaming with RC&BT for excursion service? - I think those of us who want to remember the line should spend a little time with cameras there in the very near future.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Drew Jacksich 01-04-2012 - 23:45
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Shannon 01-05-2012 - 09:09
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch stash 01-05-2012 - 09:19
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Mike Swanson 01-05-2012 - 09:34
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Carol L. Voss 01-05-2012 - 10:06
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Mike Swanson 01-05-2012 - 10:50
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Bill B 01-05-2012 - 17:56
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch MG42 01-12-2012 - 11:17
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Beach Cruiser 01-06-2012 - 20:42
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch DaveB 01-06-2012 - 20:29
  The line is not dead yet Howard 01-05-2012 - 11:13
  Re: The line is not dead yet Mike Swanson 01-05-2012 - 11:46
  I still enjoy living here Howard 01-05-2012 - 12:04
  Re: The line is not dead yet Steve Carter 01-05-2012 - 12:48
  Re: The line is not dead yet OPRRMS 01-05-2012 - 13:21
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Brian 01-05-2012 - 11:20
  Where is Omahahaha? The Anti-Rail Railfan Howard 01-05-2012 - 11:50
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Mike Swanson 01-05-2012 - 12:25
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Tony Johnson 01-05-2012 - 13:26
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch [..CSX..] 01-05-2012 - 13:43
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch BOB R 01-05-2012 - 16:41
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch csx 01-07-2012 - 15:32
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch BOB R 01-07-2012 - 21:37
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch csx 01-08-2012 - 15:55
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT NOT [..CSX..] 01-05-2012 - 17:02
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT Me 01-07-2012 - 15:01
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT NOT [..CSX..] 01-08-2012 - 22:50
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT Drew Jacksich 01-08-2012 - 22:59
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT ...---... 01-09-2012 - 16:16
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT Counterpoint 01-09-2012 - 17:41
  Re: Requiem for an IDIOT NOT [..CSX..] 01-10-2012 - 21:15
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Omahahaha 01-05-2012 - 17:01
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Beach Cruiser 01-06-2012 - 19:25
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch PT Cruiser 01-07-2012 - 19:48
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Bill B 01-05-2012 - 18:14
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Drew Jacksich 01-05-2012 - 18:52
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Happy Californian 01-05-2012 - 20:52
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Shortline Sammie 01-06-2012 - 08:13
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Howard 01-06-2012 - 09:35
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Rich Hunn 01-06-2012 - 10:16
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch OPRRMS 01-06-2012 - 12:59
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Howard 01-06-2012 - 13:34
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch OPRRMS 01-06-2012 - 19:46
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch George Andrews 01-07-2012 - 09:52
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch OPRRMS 01-07-2012 - 14:37
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Rich Hunn 01-09-2012 - 07:37
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch mook 01-06-2012 - 17:10
  @ Mook Howard 01-06-2012 - 19:06
  Re: @ Mook mook 01-07-2012 - 12:24
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Beach Cruiser 01-06-2012 - 19:45
  Isn’t this UP’s normal delivery schedule? Guess Who 01-06-2012 - 19:53
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Shortline Sammie 01-07-2012 - 07:13
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Beach Cruiser 01-07-2012 - 14:24
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Railfan & Rails-to-Trails fan 01-06-2012 - 17:49
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch Stuck on stUPid 01-08-2012 - 16:56
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch HUTCH 7.62 01-09-2012 - 17:26
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch mook 01-09-2012 - 18:12
  Re: Requiem for the UP crews Severe Duty 01-09-2012 - 19:16
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch HUTCH 7.62 01-10-2012 - 08:20
  Re: Requiem for the Santa Cruz Branch MG42 01-12-2012 - 11:52


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********    *******   **    **   *******   **      ** 
 **     **  **     **  **   **   **     **  **  **  ** 
 **     **  **         **  **    **     **  **  **  ** 
 ********   ********   *****      ********  **  **  ** 
 **         **     **  **  **           **  **  **  ** 
 **         **     **  **   **   **     **  **  **  ** 
 **          *******   **    **   *******    ***  ***  
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com