Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
Author: HUTCH 7.62
Date: 02-02-2014 - 21:34
mel*perry Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> actually,mook*hutch*7.62,*the*both*of*you*are*part
> ially*correct,it*turns
> out*that*the*two*largest*contributors*to*that*bald
> *headed*idiots*campaign*
> were*big*oil*and*socal*real*estate*developers*now*
> what*do*you*think*the*
> expected*in*return?,actually*it*is*the*land*owners
> *in*merced*county*that*
> will*see*the*first*benefits*(rezoning),*then*as*th
> e*system*expands*more*
> counties*and*land*owners*will*benefit(rezoning),*d
> ue*to*a*corrupt*political*
> system,*the*main*problem*which*has*yet*to*be*overc
> ome*is*the*availibility*
> of*WATER*,*the*fact*that*the*entire*west*coast*fro
> m*the*rockies*to*the*pacific*
> has*been*in*a*drought*for*approx*the*last*15*years
> ,*and*if*you*need*proof*of*
> this*consider*the*fact*that*socals's*main*reservoi
> r*(pyramid*lake),is*completely*
> full*(in*the*middle*of*a*drought),while*norcal's*r
> eservoir's*have*been*depleted*
> to*an*average*of*10-15*percent,*and*mandatory*rati
> oning*is*rearing*it's*ugly*head,
> now*where*do*you*think*that*this*windfall*came*fro
> m?,*not*only*once*but*twice*
> within*the*last*six*years?,and*who*do*you*think*ha
> s*the*final*say*with*the*dwr?,
Dude!... Seriously, is there a account were I donate money to fix your laptop?
Court will hear Calif. high-speed rail case
|
Pactrail |
01-30-2014 - 18:01 |
Re: Court will hear Calif. high-speed rail case
|
synonymouse |
01-30-2014 - 19:06 |
Unfortunately this, or probably not in my lifetime
|
Edward |
01-30-2014 - 22:22 |
Re: Unfortunately this, or probably not in my lifetime
|
Ed Workman |
01-31-2014 - 08:49 |
Re: Unfortunately this, or probably not in my lifetime
|
brains |
01-31-2014 - 09:09 |
Re: Unfortunately this, or probably not in my lifetime
|
Ed Workman |
01-31-2014 - 11:37 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
BOB2 |
01-31-2014 - 12:22 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
Ed Workman |
01-31-2014 - 12:42 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
Rich Hunn |
01-31-2014 - 12:49 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
mook |
01-31-2014 - 12:53 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
Bob Williams |
01-31-2014 - 17:40 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
synonymouse |
01-31-2014 - 20:22 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
BOB2 |
01-31-2014 - 20:23 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
mel*perry |
01-31-2014 - 21:51 |
Re: Ain't got $15 bucks for a new keyboard ?
|
Q |
02-01-2014 - 15:38 |
Re: Ain't got $15 bucks for a new keyboard ?
|
mel*perry |
02-01-2014 - 18:08 |
Re: Ain't got $15 bucks for a new keyboard ?
|
Dum Bass |
02-02-2014 - 13:37 |
Re: Ain't got $15 bucks for a new keyboard ?
|
mel*perry |
02-02-2014 - 19:51 |
Re: Ain't got $15 bucks for a new keyboard ?
|
"Stupid" Dum Bass |
02-02-2014 - 20:06 |
Re: Ain't got $15 bucks for a new keyboard ?
|
mel*perry |
02-02-2014 - 20:58 |
Re: Ain't got $15 bucks for a new keyboard ?
|
mel*perry |
02-02-2014 - 21:19 |
Re: Ain't got $15 bucks for a new keyboard ?
|
HUTCH 7.62 |
02-01-2014 - 18:58 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
mook |
02-01-2014 - 11:37 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
HUTCH 7.62 |
02-01-2014 - 13:11 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
mook |
02-01-2014 - 18:44 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
mook |
02-01-2014 - 21:15 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
mel*perry |
02-02-2014 - 20:29 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco? |
HUTCH 7.62 |
02-02-2014 - 21:34 |
Re: High Speed would be good, just maybe not this fiasco?
|
mel*perry |
02-02-2014 - 21:48 |