 |
Re: Voters would have to be absolutely insane to choose Kamala Harris
Author: Inna Gadda da Vida
Date: 08-01-2024 - 21:31
I'ma M'gaga Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>>THEN-ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS, reduced a host of felonies to misdemeanors, Prop. 47 which also decriminalized drug possession from a felony to a misdemeanor, removed law enforcement’s ability to make an arrest in most circumstances, as well as removing judges’ ability to order drug rehabilitation programs rather than incarceration.
> So who or which reduced the felonies, Harris or Prop 47?
Harris was behind it and supported it. Isn't that good enough for you? If you're STILL unconvinced that she's soft on crime, look up her fund raising efforts when she was trying to bail out all the looters and arsonists in Minnesota when everyone was freaking out because a fentanyl addict with an arrest record a mile long died of an overdose while he was in the custody of the cops, being arrested yet again for trying to pass counterfeit money.
> FWIW Prop 47 is widely viewed as something of a failure . . .
Gee, ya think?
> and a remedy is in the works.
What remedy would THAT be? What decade will it be implemented?
> It has to be done using the initiative process, which is arduous and time consuming.
Meanwhile, Biden can undo everything Trump did as far as border security was concerned with a few pen strokes and executive orders.
>It's a good example of what a rat's nest things can become if an initiative turns out to be a failure.
A three-year-old could have told the liberal Dems it was going to be a disaster but they're too addle-headed and always have to learn everything the hard way. Why did they propose and advance such a stupid thing in the first place? We know the answer. Because they're communist idiots.
-------------------------------------------------------
>>THEN-ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS, reduced a host of felonies to misdemeanors, Prop. 47 which also decriminalized drug possession from a felony to a misdemeanor, removed law enforcement’s ability to make an arrest in most circumstances, as well as removing judges’ ability to order drug rehabilitation programs rather than incarceration.
> So who or which reduced the felonies, Harris or Prop 47?
Harris was behind it and supported it. Isn't that good enough for you? If you're STILL unconvinced that she's soft on crime, look up her fund raising efforts when she was trying to bail out all the looters and arsonists in Minnesota when everyone was freaking out because a fentanyl addict with an arrest record a mile long died of an overdose while he was in the custody of the cops, being arrested yet again for trying to pass counterfeit money.
> FWIW Prop 47 is widely viewed as something of a failure . . .
Gee, ya think?
> and a remedy is in the works.
What remedy would THAT be? What decade will it be implemented?
> It has to be done using the initiative process, which is arduous and time consuming.
Meanwhile, Biden can undo everything Trump did as far as border security was concerned with a few pen strokes and executive orders.
>It's a good example of what a rat's nest things can become if an initiative turns out to be a failure.
A three-year-old could have told the liberal Dems it was going to be a disaster but they're too addle-headed and always have to learn everything the hard way. Why did they propose and advance such a stupid thing in the first place? We know the answer. Because they're communist idiots.
