Re: CHSRA Conference Call on Tuesday
Author: BOB2
Date: 09-24-2009 - 07:27

I was on the conference call that Mehdi and Tony Daniels held on Tuesday on the ARRA applications. The TBT was specifically mentioned as one potential use, depending on how much they got. They are backing off on some things though in the Bay Area, and agreeing to listen, a little, on things like Caltrain integrated operations and PTC. Various big ticket Caltrain/HSR grade separations were specifically mentioned. And, they clearly downsized the things they are asking for what had been the levels of funing identified from the Pre-App lists, which they are now seeming to distance themselves from. The new lists, again without any detail, except tasks and segments, did identify bond funds to be used with the ARRA requests.

CHSRA's two spokesmen appeated to be much more open to integrated operations, claiming all of the segments they requested would be used upon completion, in the interim by existing SJC and LOSSAN services, and mentioned Pacheco EIR "do-over" (taxpayers get to pay twice for incompetence) as one of the funding requests.

It was the Southern California agencies that had a list of questions to which Medhi and Tony didn't have any real answers on this call. Clearly, CHSRA had failed to communicate with any of these folks on the final project submissions, and were left unable to answer questions on any of the specifics for LA-Anaheim, such as the number of grade separations that would be funded on the LA Anaheim request, etc..

At least one Sou Cal local reporter was on the call, who asked some interesting questions. And, another questioner asked about what would happen or how projects would be scaled down, if they failed to recieve over half of all of the ARRA money just for the CHSRA? They gave a frighteningly vague ambiguous comment about spending it where they felt it was best....... that should give FRA confidence???

One questioner asked for additional information. And it is kind of indicative and embarrassing, that Tony gave out his PB e-mail address, since this has been a sole source PB contract management show.

I was told by another source this week, of yet another very high level meeting last Friday concerning personnel and/or management issues at the high speed "money train", and rumors continue to swirl that "regime change" may be pending at CHSRA. We've all heard that there is going to be a shake up in this mismanaged organization for so long now, that it sounds like a broken record, though?



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station synonymouse 09-23-2009 - 10:01
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station J Mann 09-23-2009 - 14:53
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station The Montezuma Yardmaster 09-23-2009 - 17:10
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station Ernest H. Robl 09-23-2009 - 18:02
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station Freericks 09-23-2009 - 19:14
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station BigDogsTX 09-23-2009 - 20:18
  Re: CHSRA Conference Call on Tuesday BOB2 09-24-2009 - 07:27
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station The Montezuma Yardmaster 09-24-2009 - 08:02
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station synonymouse 09-24-2009 - 09:57
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station OldPoleBurner 09-24-2009 - 10:22
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station George Andrews 09-24-2009 - 14:56
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station synonymouse 09-24-2009 - 20:02
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station The Montezuma Yardmaster 09-24-2009 - 17:18
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station Dr Zarkoff 09-24-2009 - 22:01
  Re: Kopp and SF continue to fight over downtown hsr station OldPoleBurner 09-24-2009 - 23:58
  Re: Robust Communications Options for PTC-Less dependence on track circuits. BOB2 09-25-2009 - 08:21
  Re: Robust Communications Options for PTC-Less dependence on track circuits. crmeatball 09-25-2009 - 09:25
  Re: Robust Communications Options for PTC-Less dependence on track circuits. OldPoleBurner 09-25-2009 - 12:43
  Re: Robust Communications Options for PTC-Less dependence on track circuits. Dr Zarkoff 09-25-2009 - 20:43
  Re: Robust Communications Options for PTC-Less dependence on track circuits. BOB2MM 09-25-2009 - 21:36
  Thanks Ernest H. Robl 09-26-2009 - 08:30
  Re: Robust Communications Options for PTC-Why only politicians??? George Andrews 09-26-2009 - 09:33
  Re: Robust Communications Options for PTC-Why only politicians??? Dr Zarkoff 09-26-2009 - 12:48
  Re: Robust Communications Options for PTC > imported welded rail Graham Buxton 09-26-2009 - 15:51
  Re: Robust Communications Options for PTC > imported welded rail Dr Zarkoff 09-26-2009 - 21:21


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  ********   ********   *******   **     ** 
 **   **   **     **  **        **     **  **     ** 
 **  **    **     **  **        **     **  **     ** 
 *****     ********   ******     ********  ********* 
 **  **    **     **  **               **  **     ** 
 **   **   **     **  **        **     **  **     ** 
 **    **  ********   **         *******   **     ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com