Re: Rialto Accident
Author: Dr Zarkoff
Date: 11-26-2008 - 12:03

>Please don't tell me that Metro-Link had not included that long-ago established requirement from the get-go. Indeed, in virtually every signal system design, including Metro-Link's, the minimum permissible signal spacing is predicated on that very action!

Fortunately this specification is contained, in so many words, in the CFR regs. Sometimes I think they've lost sight of fundamental signal principles. At Pitt (just west of Dixon on the Cal-P) time out of signals is 7 minutes and track speed is 79 mph. At the I St Bridge (Sacramento), track speed is 20 mph yet time out of signals is still 7 minutes. In the old days, time out of signals at the Bridge would be something like 2-3 minutes (and the track speed was 20 mph). At N Jack London going southbound, you get FY and then Y to proceed into the depot. At Emy, it's FY, Y, FR, then stop at the depot -- the very epitome of consistentency.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Railto Accident Espee99 11-23-2008 - 19:52
  Re: Railto Accident OPRRMS 11-23-2008 - 21:45
  Re: Railto Accident Cain Rock Yardmaster 11-24-2008 - 00:43
  Re: Rialto Accident Espee99 11-24-2008 - 10:08
  Re: Rialto Accident John Bruce 11-24-2008 - 10:25
  Re: Rialto Accident J 11-24-2008 - 10:36
  Re: Rialto Accident John Bruce 11-24-2008 - 10:46
  Re: Rialto Accident Cajon 11-24-2008 - 13:26
  Re: Rialto Accident John Bruce 11-24-2008 - 13:52
  Re: Rialto Accident cajon 11-24-2008 - 17:34
  Re: Rialto Accident E 11-24-2008 - 18:59
  Re: Rialto Accident John Bruce 11-25-2008 - 07:49
  Re: Rialto Accident John Bruce 11-25-2008 - 09:01
  Re: Rialto Accident OldPoleBurner 11-25-2008 - 23:51
  Re: Rialto Accident Dr Zarkoff 11-26-2008 - 12:03
  Re: "Ben Johnson" OPRRMS 11-24-2008 - 19:16
  Re: Railto Accident Havens Yardmaster 11-24-2008 - 17:52
  Re: Railto Accident Espee99 11-24-2008 - 18:31
  Re: Railto Accident cajon 11-25-2008 - 09:36
  Re: Railto Accident Espee99 11-25-2008 - 11:12
  Re: Railto Accident OPRRMS 11-25-2008 - 14:42
  Re: Railto Accident John Bruce 11-25-2008 - 12:20
  Re: Railto Accident OPRRMS 11-25-2008 - 15:07
  Re: Railto Accident cajon 11-25-2008 - 22:02
  Re: Railto Accident OPRRMS 11-25-2008 - 23:19
  Timetable showing "CP Lilac" [link] OPRRMS 11-25-2008 - 23:33
  Re: Timetable showing "CP Lilac" [link] John Bruce 11-26-2008 - 07:31
  Re: Timetable showing "CP Lilac" [link] John Bruce 11-26-2008 - 07:58
  Re: "CP College" OPRRMS 11-26-2008 - 15:53
  Re: Timetable showing "CP Lilac" [link] OPRRMS 11-26-2008 - 15:22
  Re: Timetable showing "CP Lilac" [link] OldPoleBurner 11-26-2008 - 18:19
  Re: Clyde OPRRMS 11-26-2008 - 19:02
  Re: Clyde OldPoleBurner 11-26-2008 - 19:59
  Re: Clyde OPRRMS 11-28-2008 - 20:17
  But How Hard Can This Be?? John Bruce 11-27-2008 - 07:55
  Re: But How Hard Can This Be?? Drug Testing... George Andrews 11-27-2008 - 12:40
  Re: But How Hard Can This Be?? Drug Testing... John Bruce 11-27-2008 - 12:51
  Re: But How Hard Can This Be?? Drug Testing... OPRRMS 11-27-2008 - 18:44
  Re: But How Hard Can This Be?? Drug Testing... John Bruce 11-28-2008 - 07:40
  Re: But How Hard Can This Be?? Drug Testing... OPRRMS 11-28-2008 - 19:57
  Re: Rialto Accident - Onboard Computers George Andrews 11-27-2008 - 12:59
  Re: Rialto Accident - Onboard Computers mook 11-27-2008 - 13:40
  Re: Rialto Accident - Onboard Computers OPRRMS 11-27-2008 - 19:08
  Re: Rialto Accident - Onboard Computers George Andrews 11-27-2008 - 19:14
  Re: Rialto Accident - Onboard Computers OPRRMS 11-27-2008 - 19:04
  Re: Rialto Accident - Onboard Computers George Andrews 11-28-2008 - 13:16
  Re: Rialto Accident - Onboard Computers OPRRMS 11-28-2008 - 19:53
  Re: Rialto Accident - Onboard Computers Dr Zarkoff 11-28-2008 - 19:23
  Re: Rialto Accident - Onboard Computers & Drug testing George Andrews 11-29-2008 - 16:00
  Re: But How Hard Can This Be?? Drug Testing... OPRRMS 11-27-2008 - 18:39
  Re: But How Hard Can This Be?? OPRRMS 11-27-2008 - 18:28
  Re: But How Hard Can This Be?? John Bruce 11-28-2008 - 07:35
  Re: Hard Enough For Accidents to Keep Happening OldPoleBurner 11-28-2008 - 14:35
  Re: Hard Enough For Accidents to Keep Happening John Bruce 11-28-2008 - 14:43
  Re: Hard Enough For Accidents to Keep Happening OldPoleBurner 11-28-2008 - 15:42
  Re: But How Hard Can This Be?? OPRRMS 11-28-2008 - 20:09
  Re: But How Hard Can This Be?? cajon 11-28-2008 - 21:56


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  ******   **    **  **     **   *******    ******   
 **    **   **  **   **     **  **     **  **    **  
 **          ****    **     **         **  **        
 **           **     *********   *******   **   **** 
 **           **     **     **         **  **    **  
 **    **     **     **     **  **     **  **    **  
  ******      **     **     **   *******    ******   
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com