Re: Event: Complete California High-Speed Rail in Five Years? LMAO... I love the developer and contractor funded new urbanist "front groups" for their optimism....
Author: BOB2
Date: 08-03-2023 - 09:18

Commenter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Come meet your fellow optimists. :)
>
> [sf.streetsblog.org]
> te-california-high-speed-rail-in-five-years

LMAO... I had a bet with another retired friend I used to work with who also had experienced the joy of having the assignment to "coordinate" his agencies planning with the dysfunctional Medhe Morshead run CAHSRA fiaco for part of his career, that the Feds will only fund track, signals, and "maybe" electrification of the current bloated, gold plated, stranded 10 billion dollar investment from Wasco to Chowhilla, in the upcoming Federal funding round (Due in early September???).

The State Legislature has made completing this a "requirement" before they "runaway money train" get more State funding, and has refused to provide more money to proceed with more gold plated waste in starting the ludicrously costly Pacheco segement.

I suspect that since USDOT has been unwilling to embrace the "runaway money train" publicly, that they will only focus on finishing the current 119 miles and follow the CA Legislatures lead. Feinstein's current condition and increasing inability to provide either support or cover to the CAHSRA fiasco politically means that no one in the DOT has anything to lose by stalling further CAHSRA waste and gold plating, and free's up funding for things like Del Mar Bluffs and Brightline, which are not as controversial, at least until the CAHSRA can actually finish the current gold plated 119 mile segment.

The ACE/San Joaquin Corridor project to connect to the current "beached" CAHSRA "whale" running from Wasco to Chowchilla is likely going to be fully funded. And is now being referred to as "Plan B". And despite the earlier dubious posting, about cross platform connection to the CAHSRA fiasco, the only trains likely to run on the current 119 miles (if tracks and signals are funded by the Feds) will be San Joaquin's doing 125 with Siemens Chargers. This is the only real option for quick service within five years, and would require "no" cross platform transfers withthe ACE/UP corridor extension.

If the Feds also give the CAHSRA Wasco to Chowchilla segment money for elecrirication, then CA might want to consider getting some 150 mph. capable dual mode Siemens like Amtrak is ordering for branching off of the NEC,which would allow sustained 140 mph service from Chowchilla to Waso on the current stranded investment.



Subject Written By Date/Time (PST)
  Event: Complete California High-Speed Rail in Five Years? Commenter 08-02-2023 - 20:53
  Re: Event: Complete California High-Speed Rail in Five Years? LMAO... I love the developer and contractor funded new urbanist "front groups" for their optimism.... BOB2 08-03-2023 - 09:18
  Re: Event: Complete California High-Speed Rail in Five Years? LMAO... I love the developer and contractor funded new urbanist "front groups" for their optimism.... John Bruce 08-03-2023 - 14:21
  Re: Event: Complete California High-Speed Rail in Five Years? LMAO... I love the developer and contractor funded new urbanist "front groups" for their optimism.... John Bruce 08-03-2023 - 14:36
  Re: Event: Complete California High-Speed Rail in Five Years? LMAO... I love the developer and contractor funded new urbanist "front groups" for their optimism.... FUD 08-03-2023 - 15:38
  Re: Event: Complete California High-Speed Rail in Five Years? LMAO... I love the developer and contractor funded new urbanist "front groups" for their optimism.... Beaver Cleaver 08-03-2023 - 22:59
  Re: Event: Complete California High-Speed Rail in Five Years? LMAO... I love the developer and contractor funded new urbanist "front groups" for their optimism.... FUD 08-03-2023 - 15:45
  Rumor was CHSR would poison pill the segment by building to standards that can't support the weight of traditional diesels or dual modes But 4% grades are not a problem 08-03-2023 - 19:46
  Re: Rumor was CHSR would poison pill the segment by building to standards that can't support the weight of traditional diesels or dual modes John Bruce 08-04-2023 - 10:04
  Re: Rumor was CHSR would poison pill the segment by building to standards that can't support the weight of traditional diesels or dual modes Clem 08-04-2023 - 19:43
  Re: Rumor was CHSR would poison pill the segment by building to standards that can't support the weight of traditional diesels or dual modes John Bruce 08-05-2023 - 07:27
  Re: Rumor was CHSR would poison pill the segment by building to standards that can't support the weight of traditional diesels or dual modes Transportation Planner 08-05-2023 - 08:15
  Re: Rumor was CHSR would poison pill the segment by building to standards that can't support the weight of traditional diesels or dual modes FUD 08-05-2023 - 09:12
  Re: Rumor was CHSR would poison pill the segment by building to standards that can't support the weight of traditional diesels or dual modes FUD 08-05-2023 - 09:13
  Re: Rumor was CHSR would poison pill the segment by building to standards that can't support the weight of traditional diesels or dual modes Transportation Planner 08-05-2023 - 10:28
  Re: Rumor was CHSR would poison pill the segment by building to standards that can't support the weight of traditional diesels or dual modes John Bruce 08-05-2023 - 09:14
  BOB2, can you weigh in on this "Short 4% grades will kill travel time" nonsense? Jimmie 08-05-2023 - 14:19
  I thought high speed rail didn't use steep grades on short segments precisely to avoid the rollercoaster effect Jimmie 08-05-2023 - 14:22
  Re: I thought high speed rail didn't use steep grades on short segments precisely to avoid the rollercoaster effect John Bruce 08-05-2023 - 15:15
  Re: I thought high speed rail didn't use steep grades on short segments precisely to avoid the rollercoaster effect FUD 08-05-2023 - 16:20
  Re: I thought high speed rail didn't use steep grades on short segments precisely to avoid the rollercoaster effect John Bruce 08-06-2023 - 07:14
  Re: I thought high speed rail didn't use steep grades on short segments precisely to avoid the rollercoaster effect FUD 08-06-2023 - 08:46
  Re: BOB2, can you weigh in on this? Are you sure? No, but no short four percent segment is going ot bring a 125 train down to 40 mph. in a half a mile of 4% grade. BOB2 08-05-2023 - 19:10
  Re: BOB2, can you weigh in on this? Are you sure? No, but no short four percent segment is going ot bring a 125 train down to 40 mph. in a half a mile of 4% grade. Blathering bob 08-06-2023 - 09:09
  Re: BOB2, can you weigh in on this? Are you sure? No, but no short four percent segment is going ot bring a 125 train down to 40 mph. in a half a mile of 4% grade. BOB2 08-06-2023 - 09:29
  Re: Hey look the doped up latent repressed mentally ill troll is posing as BOB2 again... BOB2 08-06-2023 - 10:36
  Re: BOB2, can you weigh in on this? Are you sure? No, but no short four percent segment is going ot bring a 125 train down to 40 mph. in a half a mile of 4% grade. Chris Walker 08-06-2023 - 14:46
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... BOB2 08-06-2023 - 15:29
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... BLOB222 08-07-2023 - 09:35
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... Chris Walker 08-07-2023 - 14:27
  Re: Well, about dynamiters.... And trolls... BOB2 08-07-2023 - 17:57
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... Dr Zarkoff 08-07-2023 - 20:36
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... Chris Walker 08-08-2023 - 04:32
  Re: As usual, I only knew the effects... The good Doctor knew the cause.... BOB2 08-08-2023 - 06:52
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... Dr Zarkoff 08-08-2023 - 13:42
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... Chris Walker 08-08-2023 - 14:56
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... Dr Zarkoff 08-08-2023 - 15:50
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... Chris Walker 08-08-2023 - 18:49
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... Dr Zarkoff 08-08-2023 - 23:59
  Re: Well, about the F3 Dr. Z. Chris Walker 08-12-2023 - 02:59
  Re: Well, about the F3 Dr. Z. Dr Zarkoff 08-12-2023 - 12:02
  Re: Well, about the F3 Dr. Z. Chris Walker 08-12-2023 - 18:01
  Re: Well, about the F3 Dr. Z. Dr Zarkoff 08-12-2023 - 19:20
  Re: Well, about the incident at the westbound Niland distant signal.... Chris Walker 08-07-2023 - 15:19
  Re: BOB2, can you weigh in on this? Are you sure? No, but no short four percent segment is going ot bring a 125 train down to 40 mph. in a half a mile of 4% grade. BLOB222 08-07-2023 - 09:30
  Re: Did Nancy work for the RR before your mental illness and dope forced you to live in mom's basement and become a troll??Are you sure? No, but no short four percent segment is going ot bring a 125 train down to 40 mph. in a half a mile of 4% grade. BOB2 08-07-2023 - 12:19
  Bob2 can name call all he wants! He's still a moron BLOB222 08-09-2023 - 07:24
  Re: You must have scored some more dope Nancy.... BOB2 08-09-2023 - 18:08
  Re: You must have scored some more dope Nancy.... BOB420.69 08-09-2023 - 19:30
  Re: You must have scored some more dope Nancy.... Yep, I guess so... BOB2 08-09-2023 - 19:36
  Re: bob2 must have scored some more dope Nancy.... BLOB222 08-10-2023 - 17:25
  Re: bob2 must have scored some more dope Nancy.... BLOB222 08-10-2023 - 17:25
  Re: bob2 must have scored some more dope Nancy.... BLOB222 08-10-2023 - 17:25
  Re: Oh Nancy did this turn you on? BOB2 08-10-2023 - 18:26
  Re: Oh Nancy did this turn you on? BOB2 08-11-2023 - 11:22
  Re: Name calling is all you got! BLOB222 08-11-2023 - 13:03
  Re: BOB2, can you weigh in on this? Are you sure? No, but no short four percent segment is going ot bring a 125 train down to 40 mph. in a half a mile of 4% grade. Wacko Taco 08-07-2023 - 12:54
  Re: BOB2, can you weigh in on this? Are you sure? No, but no short four percent segment is going ot bring a 125 train down to 40 mph. in a half a mile of 4% grade. John Bruce 08-06-2023 - 14:49
  Re: BOB2, can you weigh in on this? Are you sure? No, but no short four percent segment is going ot bring a 125 train down to 40 mph. in a half a mile of 4% grade. FUD 08-06-2023 - 19:33


Go to: Message ListSearch
Subject: 
Your Name: 
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **     **  **    **   *******   **    ** 
 **     **  **     **   **  **   **     **  **   **  
 **     **  **     **    ****    **         **  **   
 **     **  **     **     **     ********   *****    
 **     **   **   **      **     **     **  **  **   
 **     **    ** **       **     **     **  **   **  
 ********      ***        **      *******   **    ** 
This message board is maintained by:Altamont Press
You can send us an email at altamontpress1@gmail.com